Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:27:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line About broken dependencies in Debian unstable and testing (Re:
Bug#299871)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 01:14:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 17:14:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop-6.dnv.wideopenwest.com [64.233.207.24]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBjad-0003b2-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:14:20 -0800
Received: from stoneship.viqsi.ath.cx (d149-67-110-169.col.wideopenwest.com
[67.149.169.110])
by pop-6.dnv.wideopenwest.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id j2H1DlA09372
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:13:48 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: by stoneship.viqsi.ath.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 16 Mar
2005 20:12:36 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joanne Valentine-Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnucash: not installable on i386
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:12:35 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.8.10-7
Severity: important
gnucash depends on gnucash-common.
gnucash is architecture-dependent.
gnucash-common is not.
gnucash: latest version on i386 is 1.8.10-7.
gnucash-common: latest version is 1.8.10-9.
gnucash and gnucash-common both have versioned depends on eachother.
gnucash 1.8.10-7 will not install with gnucash-common 1.8.10-9.
gnucash-common 1.8.10-7 is not in any main Debian archive.
much wailing and gnashing of teeth follows.
thank god for snapshot.debian.net (discovered after two hours on Google)
but should't this be dealt with?
I sure think so.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages gnucash depends on:
pn bonobo Not found.
ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-16.2 imaging library for use with gtk (
pn guile-1.6-libs Not found.
pn guile-1.6-slib Not found.
ii libart2 1.4.2-19 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime
ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio
pn libbonobo2 Not found.
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn libdate-manip-perl Not found.
ii libdb3 3.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0] 0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) -
pn libfinance-quote-perl Not found.
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
pn libgal23 Not found.
pn libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 Not found.
ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.22.0-7 The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+
pn libghttp1 Not found.
pn libglade-gnome0 Not found.
pn libglade0 Not found.
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome32 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries
pn libgnomeprint15 Not found.
ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries (Support libra
ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
pn libgtkhtml20 Not found.
pn libguile-ltdl-1 Not found.
pn libguppi16 Not found.
pn libgwrapguile1 Not found.
ii libltdl3 1.5.6-5 A system independent dlopen wrappe
pn liboaf0 Not found.
pn libofx0c102 Not found.
ii liborbit0 0.5.17-9 Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB
ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
pn libqthreads-12 Not found.
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-10 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-10 GNOME XML library
pn libzvt2 Not found.
pn oaf Not found.
pn slib Not found.
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299871-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 19:29:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 11:29:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail8.beol.net [209.115.14.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DC0gM-0001rI-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:29:22 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail8.beol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77A74B96B;
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:29:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail8.beol.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail8.beol.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 32468-02; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:29:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [162.115.18.103] (gw.tbethshalom.org [209.115.12.48])
by mail8.beol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012D24B983;
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:29:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:27:59 -0500
From: Joanne Valentine-Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: About broken dependencies in Debian unstable and testing (Re:
Bug#299871)
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at beol.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Excerpt of email dated 3/17/2005 2:32 from 'Thomas Viehmann':
> Hi Joanne,
>
> you have submitted a complaint about gnucash being uninstallable in
> Debian/unstable.
>
> When running Debian/unstable or Debian/testing, users will sometimes
> experience[1] that a package cannot be installed due to a missing
> dependency package. This can occur when the dependency package is not
> yet built from the auto-builders, or it is waiting in the NEW queue
> as a new package to be accepted into Debian. In fact, the package
> database system indicates that the missing version of gnucash has
> entered in the Debian archive tonight within hours of your bug report.
>
> Note that this is not a bug at all but rather a temporary inconvenience
> for people using unstable and expecting to be able to upgrade each and
> every packet at all times.
I've encountered such before, which is why I normally don't report
these. I made an exception in this case only because these two packages
depend on eachother, and I had been under the impression that they would
have been built at the same time, and that simply something hadn't been
uploaded yet. If it'd just been one package revision difference, then,
hey, everybody has slow days. Two, on the other hand, with the earliest
one being in February, made me worry that perhaps they'd been mistakenly
omitted. So, this was intended as a "um, you might be missing things"
report.
Had I been less frustrated (and thus thinking more clearly) it might
have occured to me that those architectures, oh, might not have built at
the time. :D
So, um, oopsie :), sorry for the spam, and just chalk this one up to "it
is difficult to properly evaluate potential reports when one is frothing
at the mouth".
--
Joanne Valentine-Cooper (aka "Viqsi") <http://menagerie.tf/~jvc/>
Of course, I don't know how interesting any of this really is,
but now you've got it in your brain cells so you're stuck with it.
--Gary Larson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
