Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298407: fixed in xfsdump 2.2.27-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 11:10:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 03:10:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8G7l-0006HA-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 03:10:09 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D8H45-0000pl-7d; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:10:25 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfsdump: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'progname'
follows non-static declaration
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:10:25 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfsdump
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'xfsdump' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
gcc -O1 -g -DNDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include -DVERSION=\"2.2.23\"
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DPACKAGE=\"xfsdump\" -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -c -o
xfs_fsr.o xfs_fsr.c
xfs_fsr.c:109: error: static declaration of 'progname' follows non-static
declaration
/usr/include/xfs/libxfs.h:125: error: previous declaration of 'progname' was
here
xfs_fsr.c: In function 'xfs_bulkstat_single':
xfs_fsr.c:168: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
xfs_fsr.c: In function 'xfs_bulkstat':
xfs_fsr.c:181: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
make[2]: *** [xfs_fsr.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xfsdump-2.2.23'
make: *** [built] Error 2
With the attached patch 'xfsdump' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xfsdump-2.2.23/fsr/xfs_fsr.c ./fsr/xfs_fsr.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xfsdump-2.2.23/fsr/xfs_fsr.c 2004-07-28 22:21:31.000000000
+0200
+++ ./fsr/xfs_fsr.c 2005-03-07 13:00:24.569803188 +0100
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
static time_t howlong = 7200; /* default seconds of reorganizing */
static char *leftofffile = "/var/tmp/.fsrlast_xfs";/* where we left off last */
static char *mtab = MOUNTED;
-static char *progname;
+char *progname;
static time_t endtime;
static time_t starttime;
static xfs_ino_t leftoffino = 0;
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298407-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 00:56:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 16:56:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDBDF-0002pm-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:56:09 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDB4k-0007YX-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:22 -0500
From: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#298407: fixed in xfsdump 2.2.27-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:22 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: xfsdump
Source-Version: 2.2.27-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfsdump, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xfsdump_2.2.27-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfsdump/xfsdump_2.2.27-1.dsc
xfsdump_2.2.27-1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xfsdump/xfsdump_2.2.27-1.tar.gz
xfsdump_2.2.27-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfsdump/xfsdump_2.2.27-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xfsdump package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:59:22 +1100
Source: xfsdump
Binary: xfsdump
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.27-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xfsdump - Administrative utilities for the XFS filesystem
Closes: 298407
Changes:
xfsdump (2.2.27-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (closes: #298407).
Files:
718097a0eafb5d3d41139ae4ef414f7d 600 admin optional xfsdump_2.2.27-1.dsc
3b493fe3c52499e9e55fe176e964c8cd 574494 admin optional xfsdump_2.2.27-1.tar.gz
45c89cb1c0991ae7606791c5c535da41 273852 admin optional
xfsdump_2.2.27-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCPhK6m8fl3HSIa2MRAmcUAKCBy4cjxfKzPITfzEcz4sg1x+TySwCdHwKF
sBGyFsV0oSBfLI71TBATvGQ=
=6n5F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
