Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:22:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301186: suggestions about packaging tomcat5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 10:50:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 02:50:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cerberis.soften.ktu.lt [193.219.33.193] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEPvQ-0005fI-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:50:52 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cerberis.soften.ktu.lt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B69A13A1F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:27:48 -0200 (GMT+2)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:54:16 +0200
From: "Arturas K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: suggestions about packaging tomcat5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tomcat4
Version: 4.1.31-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
hi,
I guess the reason there is no tomcat5 in debian is the one requires
jdk1.5 to compile, and as there is no one packaged in debian too... am I
right?
if so, maybe my suggestion will be handy:
I suggest to package tomcat5 source code into package tomcat5-src, add
debianized build scripts and package the ones into tomcat5-package or
into the same tomcat5-src. add to both or only tomcat5-package
dependency to sun-jdk1.5 and there we go :)
installation procedure could be:
1) apt-get install java-package
2) download sun's binary jdk1.5 java distribution, build sun-jdk1.5
package, and install the one
3) apt-get install tomcat5-src tomcat5-package
4) build tomcat5 and all other packages, and install the ones we need
tomcat5-src package can have some scripts to suggest user rebuild
tomcat5 packages upon upgrade, if tomcat5 packages are found to be
installed...
---
ArturasK.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301186-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 14:22:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 06:22:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pollock.hmdnsgroup.com [63.247.129.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DETEI-0004W2-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:22:34 -0800
Received: from m869636d0.tmodns.net ([208.54.150.134])
by pollock.hmdnsgroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44)
id 1DETEB-0000KB-Vr; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:22:30 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:22:18 -0500
From: Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: All Things Computed
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050117)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Arturas K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301186: suggestions about packaging tomcat5
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pollock.hmdnsgroup.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bytemason.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Arturas K. wrote:
[...]
| I guess the reason there is no tomcat5 in debian is the one requires
| jdk1.5 to compile, and as there is no one packaged in debian too... am I
| right?
[...]
Arturas,
~ Thanks for the suggestion. Actually, Tomcat 5 does compile under a
1.4 JDK, but that is not the obstacle. The Java Packaging project for
Debian is hoping to release Tomcat 5 in the not-too-distant future.
Regards,
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCQs0ZHuKcDICy0QoRApfTAJ9WKYcqOUKJyN4YKFJjcbxwWitslwCfcrK7
AtwXJS+czLoFBoxQTod4VRQ=
=RWzJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
