Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:17:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301026: fixed in aspell 0.60.2+20050121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 11:59:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 03:59:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 203-206-238-167.dyn.iinet.net.au (mail.endbracket.net)
[203.206.238.167]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DE4WM-0002Eg-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:59:34 -0800
Received: by mail.endbracket.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 3CCAC36A00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:59:28 +1100 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Wardle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aspell-bin: l flag incorrectly documented in manual
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:59:27 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: aspell-bin
Version: 0.60.2+20050121-1
Severity: minor
The aspell(1) manual page states that "-l" lists misspelled words
from standard input (which is the way that ispell works), however
this is not the case. The l flag in fact specifies the language
to use. This can be confirmed by invoking "aspell '-?'".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7eagle-20040916
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages aspell-bin depends on:
ii libaspell15 0.60.2+20050121-1 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libncursesw5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301026-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 06:25:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 22:25:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFnh1-00025j-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:25:43 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFnYq-0007Ur-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:17:16 -0500
From: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#301026: fixed in aspell 0.60.2+20050121-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:17:16 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: aspell
Source-Version: 0.60.2+20050121-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aspell, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
aspell-bin_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aspell/aspell-bin_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
aspell-doc_0.60.2+20050121-2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/aspell/aspell-doc_0.60.2+20050121-2_all.deb
aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/aspell/aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2.diff.gz
aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2.dsc
to pool/main/a/aspell/aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2.dsc
aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/aspell/aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2_all.deb
libaspell-dev_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aspell/libaspell-dev_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
libaspell15_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aspell/libaspell15_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
libpspell-dev_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aspell/libpspell-dev_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated aspell package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:39:00 -0800
Source: aspell
Binary: libpspell-dev libaspell15 aspell libaspell-dev aspell-doc aspell-bin
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.60.2+20050121-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
aspell - GNU Aspell spell-checker
aspell-bin - GNU Aspell standalone spell-check utilities
aspell-doc - Documentation for GNU Aspell spell-checker
libaspell-dev - Development files for applications with GNU Aspell support
libaspell15 - The GNU Aspell spell-checker runtime toolkits
libpspell-dev - Development files for applications with pspell support
Closes: 301026
Changes:
aspell (0.60.2+20050121-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* manual/aspell.1: '-l' is a synonym for '--lang', not 'list'
(Closes: #301026)
* debian/control: made aspell-doc suggest aspell (>> 0.60). This is
basically for documentation purposes to indicate which aspell version
to which aspell-doc applies. Inspired by but doesn't really fix
#301201.
Files:
bb61f3d164b73da86c5f6d67c659ccbf 705 text optional aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2.dsc
c9edd234c436590f2f1ed1f31b13f8c5 16528 text optional
aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2.diff.gz
1a6d3c95c194d2ea98195983ea7dc5c8 16586 text optional
aspell_0.60.2+20050121-2_all.deb
3db0898f3bcb3b85c3e36cf41c5fc22a 128338 doc optional
aspell-doc_0.60.2+20050121-2_all.deb
b5433b28aeac464ea8c3b378968f3a85 215012 text optional
aspell-bin_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
0bbcb0c186c477dab64e7b45cfcb83be 669238 libs optional
libaspell15_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
009678329de97b3421708e92d2306796 21514 libdevel optional
libaspell-dev_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
8be59c2a4363c41f2609324422dc23b6 18866 libdevel optional
libpspell-dev_0.60.2+20050121-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCR5wz1Ng1YWbyRSERAgfeAKCtwPo6Cbvnb1dhy43yA1P9RSeTfgCcCyaG
Z2/Xy70dXgtFNao8miylpcY=
=W9sa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
