Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:51:43 +0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300210: nice joke, dude
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 11:08:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 03:08:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns2.stacksoft.ru [213.152.131.125]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCFKk-0000hq-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 03:08:02 -0800
Received: from ns.stacksoft.ru ([217.73.199.113] helo=mars.stacksoft.ru)
by ns2.stacksoft.ru with esmtp ESMTP
id 1DCFJj-0000xZ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:06:59 +0300
Received: from srr by mars.stacksoft.ru with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DCFKY-0002gC-Sn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:07:50 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Renat Sabitov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: graphviz: "apt-cache dotty | dot -Tps > debian-deps.ps" command not
complete
in 24 hours
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:07:50 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanner: exiscan *1DCFJj-0000xZ-00*ORRznlgb8AM*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: graphviz
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: normal
On my box with Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz with 1GB RAM "apt-cache
dotty | dot -Tps > debian-deps.ps" command not complete in 24 hours.
Out file size is 0. Virtual memory size was 1.6 Gb, proccess occuped
800Mb of physical memory.
This problem is not a problem of just "apt-cache dotty". Graph from
bugzilla with 4 nodes and 3 arrows takes 30 sec to compete.
dot is VERY slow, and my opinion this is a problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to ru_RU.KOI8-R)
Versions of packages graphviz depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X pixmap library
ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii tcl8.4 8.4.9-1 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
ii tk8.4 8.4.9-1 Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 -
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300210-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 10:51:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 02:51:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns2.stacksoft.ru [213.152.131.125]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFrqd-0008Aj-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:51:56 -0800
Received: from ns.stacksoft.ru ([217.73.199.113] helo=mars.stacksoft.ru)
by ns2.stacksoft.ru with esmtp ESMTP
id 1DFrq3-0005fn-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:51:19 +0400
Received: from localhost.stacksoft.ru ([127.0.0.1])
by mars.stacksoft.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1DFrqR-0006gU-KV; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:51:43 +0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:51:43 +0400
From: Renat Sabitov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: StackSoft
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300210: nice joke, dude
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanner: exiscan *1DFrq3-0005fn-00*opuVJRYs4ok*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Please read and understand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Np_hard or visit
> (and survive) theoretical CS studies. Also try to understand why it is
> not so wise to use swap memory.
Ok, I am visit this link and yes, I agree that "apt-cache dotty" not a
good example for slowness of dot.
But i report that even on 3 nodes dot take about 30 sec.I investigate my
problem with dot and found that it work slow if called from bugzilla.
Not yet know why. From shell on same data it is fast.
This bugreport is invalid, sorry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
