Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389645: Shallo I fix it? Shall I NMU?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-11
Severity: important
Justification: causes destruction of hardware (CD/DVD media)

Hello,

while working on wodim I found that the mount command tries to open the
devices without the O_EXCL flag. This is really bad, since if a
non-rewriteable medium is beeing recorded at that moment, it is
definitely destroyed, not even burnfree feature seems to help.

Tell me if you need a patch to fix that behaviour.

Eduard.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mount depends on:
ii  libblkid1                    1.39-1      block device id library
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libuuid1                     1.39-1      universally unique id library

mount recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> if you are busy with your Ubuntu work, I can understand that. It is not
> as important as the boring Debian stuff. But please react to this
> message. Shall I fix the problem and NMU util-linux? Is anybody working
> on that?

Opening the device exclusively would tend to break mounting the device
multiple times.

not a bug.
lamont

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to