Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 21:33:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Interpret diff files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wdiff
Version: 0.5-14
Severity: wishlist

  Occasionally I get a diff file for a piece of text that I'd like to
convert to a wdiff (to examine the changes).  Right now I have to
actually patch the file, then compare the patched version to the
original.  However, it seems to me that wdiff could probably generate a
wdiff straight from the diff.  This would be pretty convenient for lazy
people :)

  Daniel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

Versions of packages wdiff depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5                 5.4-3        Shared libraries for terminal hand

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Daniel Burrows wrote:

> Package: wdiff
> Version: 0.5-14
> Severity: wishlist
> 
>   Occasionally I get a diff file for a piece of text that I'd like to
> convert to a wdiff (to examine the changes).  Right now I have to
> actually patch the file, then compare the patched version to the
> original.  However, it seems to me that wdiff could probably generate a
> wdiff straight from the diff.  This would be pretty convenient for lazy
> people :)
> 
>   Daniel

The problem is that wdiff does not work that way. When you give two
files to wdiff, it creates two temporary files containing each word in
a single line, and only then it takes the diff and it's processed.

What you are asking for is some sort of Artificial Intelligence,
which I think it is outside the scope of this program.

I'm closing this bug, but I'm also Cc:ing the author, just in case he
wants to consider your suggestion.

Thanks.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to