Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:44:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302203: Please stop building xprt-xprintorg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 16:14:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 08:14:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGfpj-0001op-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:14:19 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DGfph-0004Xe-MN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:14:17 +0200
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:14:17 +0200
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please stop building xprt-xprintorg
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xprint-xprintorg
Severity: important
The xprt-xprintorg binary package is currently built in a higher version
by xprint. This means that a new revision of this package without
dropping this binary package from debian/control would be refused by
ftp-master because there already is a higher version in the archive.
Please stop building xprt-xprintorg to re-enable (security-)updates to
this source package to be accepted.
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302203-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 10:44:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 02:44:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGxA2-0000Fa-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 02:44:26 -0800
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DGx9y-0003Oo-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:44:22 +0200
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:44:22 +0200
To: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#302203: Please stop building xprt-xprintorg
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:23:15PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 04:18 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> > No, just to stop building that specific binary package from the
> > xprint-xprintorg source package, by dropping it from debian/control and
> > debian/rules where appropriately.
> >
>
> I still don't understand then. Other packages depend on xprt-xprintorg.
> I can't remove it until they have updated their dependencies.
>
> It's only a dummy package now that depends on the new xprint binary
> package. Why is it causing problems?
Ah, it is a package rename. Sorry, didn't look into the issue well
enough to actually decide what was going on here, just noticed the
binary package name clash.
Anyway, I just resolved #302316, xprt-common was not depended on anymore
by any package, so this bug is now done.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
