Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:59:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301544: please drop roleplaying from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 17:07:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 09:07:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFElJ-0002kP-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:07:49 -0800
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DFElH-0002bn-V8
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:07:47 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please drop roleplaying from the archive
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: All the problems and twice the bugs.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 Mar 2005 09:07:47 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please drop roleplaying from the archive (see bug #246486 for more
info).
Procedural question: I thought that the right thing was actually to
reassign and retitle 246496 to ftp. If I do that, then the RC bug
goes away against roleplaying, which might cause things to think it
works. If I reassign to ftp+roleplaying, and keep it RC, then there's
an RC bug against ftp which is wrong. So I don't know the right
thing.
Thomas
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301544-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 10:59:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 02:59:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGxOr-00012m-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 02:59:46 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DGxOq-0000vU-MS
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:59:44 +0200
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:59:44 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301544: please drop roleplaying from the archive
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 06:35:27PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:07:47AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Procedural question: I thought that the right thing was actually to
> > reassign and retitle 246496 to ftp. If I do that, then the RC bug
> > goes away against roleplaying, which might cause things to think it
> > works. If I reassign to ftp+roleplaying, and keep it RC, then there's
> > an RC bug against ftp which is wrong. So I don't know the right
> > thing.
>
> Clone the RC bug and reassign the clone to ftp.d.o :). After all, this
> is basically the same issue, but you want a new bug asking for a
> different action (rather than fixing it in the package, to get it
> removed).
>
> Now you've already filed a new bug, don't bother.
This bug is already resolved in reaction to #216879. Closing.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
