Your message dated Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:36:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311141: Bug still reproducible (was: avra: you can't have
a macro with the same name as an op-code)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: avra
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: wishlist
eg.
when coding for the lesser AVR mpus it'd be handy to have some sort of warning
if I try to use an unimplemented op-code. (eg call) I Tried adding this to the
2313def.inc file (for 90s2313)
.macro call
rcall @0
.warning "rcall substituted for call"
.endmacro
it had no effect.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux clunker.homenet 2.4.18 #16 SMP Fri Apr 8 10:36:46 GMT-12 2005 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages avra depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 311141 wontfix
thanks
On 2007-01-19 at 20:35:02 +0100, jasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:26:00PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > This bug has been in the BTS for almost two years :-/ I took over
> > maintainership of this package recently, so I hope to clear this up now.
> >
> > According to some quick tests I ran here with the avra 1.2.1 (uploaded
> > yesterday to unstable) it seems that this bug still exists. Did you
> > contact the upstream maintainer about it or do you have some more
> > information? Otherwise I'll investigate and inform upstream.
>
> I took no further action. after reporting it, I modified my behavior
> and forgot about it. (also it's been 18 months since I last used avra)
>
> I think of it more as a feature request than a bug. If it had really
> bothered me there'd be a patch for it.
Ok, so I'm closing this bug for now, tagging it wontfix. In case
anyone wants to have this feature implemented feel free to reopen the
bug.
Cheers, Tobias
--- End Message ---
