Your message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:08:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408039: problems removing unixodbc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: unixodbc
Version: 2.2.11-13
Severity: normal

when trying removing unixodbc package managers go crazy - apt-get says 
something is broken, 
synaptic silently refuses to mark package for removal, and even aptitude (which 
is recomended)
say's that something is wrong. This is completely reproducible on two 
up-to-date etch systems.


sudo aptitude remove unixodbc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Writing extended state information... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages are BROKEN:
  sun-java5-bin
The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
  ark arts dcoprss desktop-base desktop-file-utils kate kdeaddons-kfile-plugins 
kdeartwork-misc kdeartwork-style kdeartwork-theme-icon
  kdeartwork-theme-window kdemultimedia-kfile-plugins kdepasswd 
kdepim-kfile-plugins kdepim-kio-plugins kdepim-wizards kdewallpapers kget 
khelpcenter
  kmail kmailcvt kmenuedit kmix konq-plugins konqueror-nsplugins kopete korn 
kpager kpersonalizer kscreensaver kscreensaver-xsavers ksmserver ksync
  ksysv ktip kuser libarts1-mpeglib libeel2-2 libeel2-data libgadu3 libgle3 
libgnome-desktop-2 libgsmme1c2a libgtksourceview-common libkdegames1
  libksieve0 librss1 libtunepimp-bin mkisofs mpeglib powermgmt-base psutils 
xscreensaver-gl
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  unixodbc
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 54 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 116MB will be freed.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  sun-java5-bin: Depends: unixodbc but it is not installable
Resolving dependencies...
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Remove the following packages:
sun-java5-bin
sun-java5-demo
sun-java5-jdk
sun-java5-jre

Install the following packages:
gcj-4.1-base [4.1.1-20 (testing)]
gij-4.1 [4.1.1-20 (testing)]
libgcj-common [1:4.1.1-21 (testing)]
libgcj7-0 [4.1.1-20 (testing)]
libgcj7-jar [4.1.1-20 (testing)]

Score is -1699

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]                            

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)

Versions of packages unixodbc depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libltdl3                     1.5.22-4    A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libreadline5                 5.2-2       GNU readline and history libraries
ii  odbcinst1debian1             2.2.11-13   Support library and helper program

unixodbc recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:20:24AM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when trying removing unixodbc package managers go crazy - apt-get says
> something is broken, synaptic silently refuses to mark package for removal,
> and even aptitude (which is recomended) say's that something is wrong. This
> is completely reproducible on two up-to-date etch systems.

Sure, the package manager objects to you trying to remove a package that's
used by lots of other packages you have installed.  That's not a bug in
unixodbc.

> sudo aptitude remove unixodbc
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Writing extended state information... Done
> Building tag database... Done
> The following packages are BROKEN:
>   sun-java5-bin
> The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
>   ark arts dcoprss desktop-base desktop-file-utils kate 
> kdeaddons-kfile-plugins kdeartwork-misc kdeartwork-style kdeartwork-theme-icon
>   kdeartwork-theme-window kdemultimedia-kfile-plugins kdepasswd 
> kdepim-kfile-plugins kdepim-kio-plugins kdepim-wizards kdewallpapers kget 
> khelpcenter
>   kmail kmailcvt kmenuedit kmix konq-plugins konqueror-nsplugins kopete korn 
> kpager kpersonalizer kscreensaver kscreensaver-xsavers ksmserver ksync
>   ksysv ktip kuser libarts1-mpeglib libeel2-2 libeel2-data libgadu3 libgle3 
> libgnome-desktop-2 libgsmme1c2a libgtksourceview-common libkdegames1
>   libksieve0 librss1 libtunepimp-bin mkisofs mpeglib powermgmt-base psutils 
> xscreensaver-gl
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>   unixodbc
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 54 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 116MB will be freed.
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   sun-java5-bin: Depends: unixodbc but it is not installable
> Resolving dependencies...
> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

> Remove the following packages:
> sun-java5-bin
> sun-java5-demo
> sun-java5-jdk
> sun-java5-jre

> Install the following packages:
> gcj-4.1-base [4.1.1-20 (testing)]
> gij-4.1 [4.1.1-20 (testing)]
> libgcj-common [1:4.1.1-21 (testing)]
> libgcj7-0 [4.1.1-20 (testing)]
> libgcj7-jar [4.1.1-20 (testing)]

So aptitude believes it's better to install a different jre that doesn't
depend on unixodbc, instead of removing sun-java5 and all other packages
depending on it.  I don't see any bug here.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to