Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:03:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302505: version of elinks with Spidermonkey support
compiled in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 05:39:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 21:39:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from user-0c99bpv.cable.mindspring.com (taylor.homelinux.net)
[24.148.175.63]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHEs1-0007Hy-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:39:01 -0800
Received: by taylor.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9DD08A0C003; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:39:38 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lorenzo Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: version of elinks with Spidermonkey support compiled in
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:39:38 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: elinks
Version: 0.10.2-2
Severity: wishlist
A version of elinks for those not too concerned with number of dependencies that
has spidermonkey JavaScript support builtin would be quite beneficial to those
of us who use only the console environment but want to access sites that require
that JavaScript be enabled.
A suggestion would be that if, as per some wishlist bugs pending upload, there
will be an elinks-lite or similar package, that the spidermonkey support should
be built in the standard elinks package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages elinks depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.47 Debian configuration management sy
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-19 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib
ii liblua50 5.0.2-5 Main interpreter library for the L
ii liblualib50 5.0.2-5 Extension library for the Lua 5.0
ii libsmjs1 1.5rc6a-1 The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScrip
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302505-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 01:03:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 18:03:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lifeforce.hu (narya.grin.hu) [195.38.113.134]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIFzo-0001YU-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:03:18 -0700
Received: from localhost.lifeforce.hu
([127.0.0.1] helo=narya ident=grin)
by narya.grin.hu with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DIFzd-0004RU-Be
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 03:03:13 +0200
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:03:04 +0200
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#302505: version of elinks with Spidermonkey support
compiled in
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Disorganized
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1cvs7.3 (GTK+ 2.6.2; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Operating-System: Leenooks
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----)
X-Scan-Signature: 0abbe592c24c99beb841ec40953fcead
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
(closing)
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:31:14 -0500
Lorenzo Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # I compiled mine with SM but it is completely useless. I found no working
> site so far
> # (apart from getting various interesting errors). You may try it for
> yourself easily
> # by getting the debian source, change the configure line in debian/rules to
> include
> # spidermonkey and compile. (If you need more help, ask privately.)
>
> Yep. Upon building the package source, I found only a few slight improvements
> over just plain elinks without SM compiled in. The major functionality I need
> isn't happening.
Good enough reason to wait a bit more. :)
> # In the current state I see no point of having it compiled in. Needs much
> maturing.
>
> Yep. I think you're right. I guess I should have tried it a little more
> extensively before filing. It looked like it would work, but it really
> doesn't
> do much better than links2 over here. I didn't really get that many errors,
> but
> in some cases it simply blanked out the page and in others, a redirect after
> processing didn't work where needed. I just thought it would be better than
> this since Spidermonkey is the Mozilla JavaScript engine that the Mozilla
> browsers use internally.
I believe the engine is there but it requires the interface to elinks too, which
is not yet written. It is going to be great if pasky and team get some time and
code it. ;-)
Till then, closing this one.
Thanks,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
