Your message dated Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:51:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411107: Name resolution problem since netbase upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netbase
Version: 4.29
Hello,
since I upgraded netbase, local name resolution does not work
correctly.
Thanks for help.
**************
small:~# ping debian
PING rodenbach.chezmoi.local (192.168.100.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from rodenbach.chezmoi.local (192.168.100.7): icmp_seq=1
ttl=64 time=6.60 ms
small:~# ping debian.chezmoi.local
ping: unknown host debian.chezmoi.local
**************
small:~# dig debian
; <<>> DiG 9.3.2-P1 <<>> debian
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 33621
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;debian. IN A
;; Query time: 2 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.100.5#53(192.168.100.5)
;; WHEN: Fri Feb 16 09:23:35 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 24
******************
small:~# dig debian.chezmoi.local
; <<>> DiG 9.3.2-P1 <<>> debian.chezmoi.local
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29507
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL:
0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;debian.chezmoi.local. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
debian.chezmoi.local. 3600 IN CNAME
rodenbach.chezmoi.local.
rodenbach.chezmoi.local. 3600 IN A 192.168.100.7
;; Query time: 2 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.100.5#53(192.168.100.5)
;; WHEN: Fri Feb 16 09:24:24 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 78
*************************************
Linux version 2.6.18-3-686 (Debian 2.6.18-7) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-20)) #1 SMP Mon Dec
4 16:41:14 UTC 2006
small:~# cat /etc/debian_version
4.0
Package: netbase
Versions:
4.29(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_main_binar
y-i386_Packages)(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
--
Cordialement.
Louis-Maurice De Sousa
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Feb 16, Louis-Maurice De Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since I upgraded netbase, local name resolution does not work
> correctly.
Hard to believe.
> small:~# ping debian
> PING rodenbach.chezmoi.local (192.168.100.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from rodenbach.chezmoi.local (192.168.100.7): icmp_seq=1
> ttl=64 time=6.60 ms
This command uses /etc/hosts.
> small:~# ping debian.chezmoi.local
> ping: unknown host debian.chezmoi.local
This one too.
> small:~# dig debian
This one does not.
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2-P1 <<>> debian
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 33621
But your name server is broken. SERVFAIL, you see?
Looks like you messed with /etc/resolv.conf, which used to have a search
statement (bad idea).
Also check nsswitch.conf.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
