Your message dated Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:35:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Overrides: some corrections needed for Etch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openbsd-inetd
Version: 0.20050402-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
policy: "Packages must not depend on packages with lower priority values"
Currently openbsd-inetd shows up as "important" but it [1]depends on
update-inetd which is only "standard". I think the [2]overrides are wrong, not
the package itself, but I don't know where to report rc bugs in overrides.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/testing/net/openbsd-inetd
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openbsd-inetd.html
Sorry if there are automatic checks that would have caught this anyway.
(There should be, if there aren't!)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> During installation tests I noticed the following inconsistencies with
> regards to priorities of packages. Please consider correcting their
> priority in the overrides file.
>
> [...]
All done, including
> - libldap-2.3-0 (will replace libldap2)
> - liblzo2-2 (will replace liblzo1)
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--- End Message ---
