Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:28:47 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388759: fixed in aiccu 20070115-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aiccu
Severity: normal
The aiccu license states the following additional clauses which caused
it to be considered as non-free:
| 4. One should not remove any reference to, or logo of, SixXS.
| 5. When the software is altered to not use SixXS services, one is
| kindly asked to notify SixXS of this by sending an email to the
| SixXS Staff at [EMAIL PROTECTED], containing at least the following
| details:
| [snip]
Pim van Pelt answered with the following clarifications:
| > 5. When the software is altered ...
| > How is the "kindly asked" to be interpreted? As a weak and polite
| > form of "must", or as a "should"? That would make quite a difference
| > for us. If it's a requirement, it fails both the Desert Island test
| > and the Chinese Dissident test[1]. Could you please clarify this?
| It's a should.
|
| > 4. One should not remove any reference to, or logo of, SixXS.
| > So this is a RFC definition of `should'... So if I modify it not to
| > connect to SixXS, I am allowed not to display any reference to
| > SixXs, it's just discouraged? (With the proper copyright notices
| > intact of course.)
| You will not violate the intent of our license if you remove the logo.
|
| This program is intended to be used with SixXS. If you do not wish to
| use SixXS services, you can safely 'violate' 4 and 5. We much prefer
| that the fruit of our programming efforts are used together with the
| fruit of our internet service providers' efforts.
Jeroen Massar further clarified the `should' used in clause 4:
| The "SHOULD" from the IETF, which is a _strong_ hint. If we wanted
| that then we would write "MUST". Note also that we used the BSD
| license as a base so that eg hardware vendors could simply take the
| code and use it without any legal issues (except for compaining
| legal/patent folks).
I wrote on 2006-08-14:
| I spoke to Anthony Towns, one of our ftpmasters, on IRC and he told me
| to go for it. [ie. to upload the package to main]
It would be nice to see aiccu in etch/main and autobuilt. This
discussion started on 2006-08-12, the maintainer did not respond until
now although he was copied on the whole conversation. (Which is, by the
way, archived in debian-email on master.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: aiccu
Source-Version: 20070115-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aiccu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
aiccu_20070115-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/aiccu/aiccu_20070115-1.diff.gz
aiccu_20070115-1.dsc
to pool/main/a/aiccu/aiccu_20070115-1.dsc
aiccu_20070115-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/a/aiccu/aiccu_20070115-1_amd64.deb
aiccu_20070115-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/aiccu/aiccu_20070115-1_i386.deb
aiccu_20070115.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/aiccu/aiccu_20070115.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated aiccu package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 02:51:36 +0100
Source: aiccu
Binary: aiccu
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 20070115-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
aiccu - SixXS Automatic IPv6 Connectivity Client Utility
Closes: 366002 379766 388759 405606 405610 407026
Changes:
aiccu (20070115-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Upload package with me as an interim maintainer. Anand orphaned this
package in private mail to me. (Closes: #407026)
* Upload to `main' because of licence change in 20070107.
(Closes: #388759)
* New upstream version with the packaging based upon the one provided
by upstream in the source tarball. aiccu is now up-to-date which
should fix issues when connecting to SixXS.
(Closes: #405606, #405610, #379766)
* Slight packaging changes: I made the packaging non-native and changed
some permission bits, dependencies and files to conform to the
Debian standards and to fix various Lintian warnings and errors.
Please see the diff for details.
* The amd64 binary package is included in the upload.
(Closes: #366002)
Files:
78d72415ccf22197d681fc62b4f92f09 43536 net optional aiccu_20070115-1_amd64.deb
9da28cdede41753991b49020f3752a12 586 net optional aiccu_20070115-1.dsc
d0a56d7f80a5e8747519a2dd7c0eae44 70007 net optional aiccu_20070115.orig.tar.gz
d86fa4d39eaca3cdd8110311c7cd4150 3804 net optional aiccu_20070115-1.diff.gz
e907adf0f2e373e1deba27236ca119ce 42790 net optional aiccu_20070115-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFyTH97Ro5M7LPzdgRAiZJAKC0VLs6atJU8ni461IPPBn/s8VBtwCfX9/f
wX77YfM9n6U4y9WDoPF37S0=
=LaB0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
