Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:30:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302682: automake1.9: Missing tar dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 10:45:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 02:45:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHg8V-00007f-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 02:45:52 -0800
Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5568AE6A96; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:45:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10753-11; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:45:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org
(dsl-80-41-13-54.access.as9105.com [80.41.13.54])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1619DE6A88; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:45:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rleigh by hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim
4.50)
id 1DHfyR-0004iB-BM; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:35:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: automake1.9: Missing tar dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:35:27 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: automake1.9
Version: 1.9.5-1
Severity: normal
Hi Eric,
automake1.9 provides the facility to select the tar format to use (v7,
posix, pax), and this works very well. However, the newer formats do
require tar 1.14 in order to work. Due to the base freeze, sarge only
has 1.13 available.
Although tar is in base, adding a versioned dependency would prevent
breakage ("make dist" failing or producing broken archives). This is
probably too late for sarge, and won't be a problem for etch, so
doing nothing might also work.
Regards,
Roger
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages automake1.9 depends on:
ii autoconf 2.59a-3 automatic configure script builder
ii autotools-dev 20041130.2 Update infrastructure for config.{
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302682-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2005 19:35:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 12:35:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJGJY-0007kz-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:35:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1B1DAE6D5D; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:35:27 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 21001-12; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:35:27 +0100 (BST)
Received: from hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org
(dsl-80-41-6-173.access.as9105.com [80.41.6.173])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B8A6DE6D4B; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:35:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rleigh by hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim
4.50)
id 1DJGEt-0003M8-7X; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:30:59 +0100
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#302682: automake1.9: Missing tar dependency
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:30:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Steve Langasek's
message of "Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:00:11 -0700")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:54:37PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> >>> automake1.9 provides the facility to select the tar format to use (v7,
>> >>> posix, pax), and this works very well. However, the newer formats do
>> >>> require tar 1.14 in order to work. Due to the base freeze, sarge only
>> >>> has 1.13 available.
>
>> > It probably won't be possible to upgrade tar in base, but I think
>> > that's the only real solution for this [Bdale, is there any
>> > possibility of tar 1.14 for sarge?].
>
>> Actually, Steve Langasek and I talked yesterday about the possibility of
>> promoting tar 1.14-2 into sarge for other reasons. Checking madison on
>> merkel
>> shows that it hasn't happened yet, I'll CC him on this reply for comment.
>
> It should have happened today, but I screwed around with britney too much
> and it seems that doing this un-commits changes from testing (hmm, wish I'd
> figured that out earlier). tar 1.14-2 should go in (again) with tonight's
> britney run.
Thanks. I've closed the bug.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCVDjtVcFcaSW/uEgRAnxMAJ4r8EaEHnvhGpXGwsofpsLHexdXiwCfTVwz
OMBw1krmi1g7g/Bjd2pBhgo=
=oM2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
