Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:31:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415908: lhs2tex: Indirect dependency conflict with texlive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lhs2tex
Version: 1.11-2
Severity: important
There are currently two competing TeX distributions in Debian: tetex
and texlive. They cannot both be installed concurrently. lhs2tex
currently depends only on tetex; therefore texlive users cannot
install lhs2tex.
If (as is probably the case) lhs2tex works with texlive, the
dependencies should be changed from
tetex-base, tetex-bin
to something like
tetex-base | texlive-base, tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin
I don't know if this is precisely the correct dependency; you (the
maintainer) should probably check with the Debian texlive maintainers.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.12-2
Op vrijdag 23-03-2007 om 10:40 uur [tijdzone +1100], schreef Trent Buck:
> There are currently two competing TeX distributions in Debian: tetex
> and texlive. They cannot both be installed concurrently. lhs2tex
> currently depends only on tetex; therefore texlive users cannot
> install lhs2tex.
Hi Trent,
I am aware of the issue and it is fixed in the version in experimental.
As we should be really close to the release of Etch now, I don't think
this will be fixed in Etch though.
I will upload an fixed version to unstable as well.
Greetings Arjan
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
--- End Message ---
