Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 09:34:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug no longer showing up
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: glabels
Version: 2.1.3-1
Severity: normal
Labels: DECADry OCC-3727 10 x (85 x 54) mm Business Cards.
Paper size: A4
Template input:
Label width: 85.0mm
Label height: 54.0mm
0.00mm round, horiz/vertical waste and 0.00 margin.
1 layout.
Number across: 2
Number down: 5
Distance from left edge: 15.0mm
Distance from top edge: 13.5mm
Horizontal pitch: 95.0mm
Vertical pitch: 54.0mm
Template file:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Glabels-templates xmlns="http://snaught.com/glabels/2.0/";>
<Template name="Decadry OCC-3727" size="A4" description="Business
Cards">
<Label-rectangle id="0" width="240.945pt" height="153.071pt"
round="0pt" x_waste="0pt" y_waste="0pt">
<Markup-margin size="0pt"/>
<Layout nx="2" ny="5" x0="42.5197pt" y0="38.2677pt" dx="269.291pt"
dy="153.071pt"/>
</Label-rectangle>
</Template>
</Glabels-templates>
Actual printout:
Label width: 80.0mm
Label height: 50.0mm
Distance from left edge: 23.0mm
Distance from top edge: 12.0mm
Distance between columns: 10.0mm (correct)
Distance between rows: 0.0mm (correct)
Distance from right edge: 17.5mm
Distance from bottom edge: 30.0mm
Expected figures:
Label width: 85.0mm
Label height: 54.0mm
Distance from left edge: 15.0mm
Distance from top edge: 13.5mm
Distance from right edge: 15.0mm
Distance from bottom edge: 13.5mm
I've tried printing a large text file (the GPL licence) in AbiWord
without any margins, headers or footers and the printable area with my
Epson Stylus Color (sic) 660 is 217mm x 272mm. The bottom 20mm is not
printable and the printable area begins 4mm from the left edge of A4.
Other 10 x (85 x 54) templates give the same result - I started off
using DECADry DAW-327 and tried DECADry SCW-2090 too.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages glabels depends on:
ii glabels-data 2.1.3-1 data files for gLabels
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libebook1.2-5 1.6.3-1+b1 Client library for evolution addre
ii libgconf2-4 2.14.0-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.0-2 library to load .glade files at ru
ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome2-0 2.14.1-3 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.14.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display
ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.12.1-6 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.12.1-4 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User
ii libgnomeui-0 2.14.1-2+b1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.14.2-2+b1 GNOME virtual file-system (runtime
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.20-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpopt0 1.10-3 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3 GNOME XML library
glabels recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
For whatever reason, the print out is now fine. The alignment is
correct. I suspect some issue with the print subsystem but I cannot be
certain. I started again with a new glabels document with the same
business cards, OCC-3727. The new file printed with the correct
alignment. I then decompressed the old and new files and compared the
XML - the template section of the file was identical. Upon printing the
old file, I found that the alignment was also correct.
The only thing that I've done with the print server since the bug
report is upgraded it to Etch so I can only assume that some quite old
parts of the printing subsystem were to blame for the original bug.
Closing the bug report.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpNtl0lO4Rdm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
