Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:17:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295071: fixed in gazpacho 0.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 12:48:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 13 04:48:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c90634e4.virtua.com.br (localhost) [201.6.52.228] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D0JAv-0004Il-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 04:48:33 -0800
Received: from gpastore by localhost with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1D0JAt-0001UW-Fn; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:48:31 -0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gazpacho segfaults
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:48:31 -0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gazpacho
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: important

Sorry for being so undescriptive in the bug title, but I wouldn't be able
to explain it properly there.

A quick way to reproduce the segmentation fault follows:

1) Run gazpacho
2) Click on "Gtk+ Standard Dialogs"
3) Click on "Input dialog"
4) Select anything from the "Mode" combo on the dialog
5) Tchan!

Backtrace follows:

#0  0xb787501d in gtk_input_dialog_new () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1  0xb7c303b6 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#2  0xb7c1e6b6 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#3  0xb7c2fec8 in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#4  0xb7c2ef4c in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5  0xb7c2f1e6 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6  0xb797ec57 in gtk_widget_activate () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#7  0xb789e842 in gtk_menu_shell_activate_item ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#8  0xb789ddd5 in _gtk_menu_shell_activate () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9  0xb7896b66 in gtk_menu_reorder_child () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 0xb788f80e in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 0xb7c1e949 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 0xb7c1e6b6 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 0xb7c2f925 in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 0xb7c2ed3a in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 0xb7c2f1e6 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 0xb797ea87 in gtk_widget_send_expose () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 0xb788e322 in gtk_propagate_event () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 0xb788d176 in gtk_main_do_event () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 0xb773c815 in _gdk_events_queue () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 0xb7bb56b2 in g_main_depth () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#21 0xb7bb6738 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#22 0xb7bb6a70 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#23 0xb7bb7013 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 0xb788ca23 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 0xb7af917d in init_gtk ()
   from /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so
#26 0x080ab80a in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords ()
#27 0x080a9bee in Py_MakePendingCalls ()
#28 0x080aa77c in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#29 0x080ab8e9 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords ()
#30 0x080ab72c in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords ()
#31 0x080a9bee in Py_MakePendingCalls ()
#32 0x080aa77c in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#33 0x080ab8e9 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords ()
#34 0x080ab72c in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords ()
#35 0x080a9bee in Py_MakePendingCalls ()
#36 0x080aa77c in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#37 0x080acf79 in PyEval_EvalCode ()
#38 0x080d90db in PyRun_FileExFlags ()
#39 0x080d885f in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags ()
#40 0x08054e95 in Py_Main ()
#41 0x080549eb in main ()

Hope it's useful =)

See ya,

--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gazpacho depends on:
ii  python                        2.3.5-1    An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-gtk2                   2.4.1-2    Python bindings for the GTK+ widge

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295071-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2005 05:27:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 22:27:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DLaPu-0003Ja-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:27:58 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DLaFP-0007dG-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:17:07 -0400
From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295071: fixed in gazpacho 0.5.3-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:17:07 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: gazpacho
Source-Version: 0.5.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gazpacho, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gazpacho_0.5.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gazpacho/gazpacho_0.5.3-1.diff.gz
gazpacho_0.5.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gazpacho/gazpacho_0.5.3-1.dsc
gazpacho_0.5.3-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gazpacho/gazpacho_0.5.3-1_all.deb
gazpacho_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gazpacho/gazpacho_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gazpacho package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:54:21 -0300
Source: gazpacho
Binary: gazpacho
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gazpacho   - GTK+ User Interface Designer
Closes: 290953 295071
Changes: 
 gazpacho (0.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   - no longer provides Input Dialog (Closes: #295071)
   * debian/patches/{01_setup_generate_path,02_more_sanely_sized_window}.diff:
   - removed, both fixed upstream
   * debian/patches/01_no_uninstall.diff:
   - added; gazpacho should not be providing uninstall
     features that the package is responsible for handling
   * debian/gazpacho.1:
   - written with the help of help2man to generate the first
     template (Closes: #290953)
Files: 
 c0d3c86257c99fe2718e04c8b514b75e 596 devel optional gazpacho_0.5.3-1.dsc
 a195ea21c034bac1c3274ff908cc082b 298936 devel optional 
gazpacho_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz
 fc1ab9e949bf57b54539d89354607310 11055 devel optional gazpacho_0.5.3-1.diff.gz
 38888823eb24e7aa64b95ba1a6db3613 257658 devel optional gazpacho_0.5.3-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCXKc+t1anjIgqbEsRAovPAJ46cp1Y1qEmWdd+vfaHFz2DWgVqBACfdRyO
cbSm1XnQeU0rTb6T91IWhGw=
=EC5a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to