Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:18:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262139: fixed in stripclub 0.9.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2004 21:44:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 29 14:44:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BqIhb-0004Cu-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:44:39 -0700
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i6TLibIY013337
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:44:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA2957430
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:44:35 +0200
Received: (qmail 24015 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2004 21:44:34 -0000
Received: from ?80.137.23.110? (HELO live) (80.137.23.110)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Jul 2004
21:44:34 -0000
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BqIhU-0006am-N0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:44:32 +0200
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:44:32 +0200
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: stripclub: Packaging the new version (v0.8)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
X-GPG-Key: http://ernst.uni-hd.de/pubkey.asc
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 34F8 7997 8BC1 03F0 9C43 F3D7 B375 3E4D 514B 3E7C
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: stripclub
Severity: wishlist
Hello Benjamin,
without doubt you know about the new version, please also consider
packaging it when you think it is due time.
Cheers,
Flo
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBCW/As3U+TVFLPnwRArr/AJ98BC78P0FeW0j8hzWfWXXW1nKzXgCfRi34
gFRLWfkC2Ur7JykM20gpmag=
=zrjD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 262139-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 11:23:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 04:23:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM2R4-0007Tj-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:23:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM2MS-0004yf-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:18:16 -0400
From: Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#262139: fixed in stripclub 0.9.1.1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:18:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: stripclub
Source-Version: 0.9.1.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
stripclub, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
stripclub_0.9.1.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/stripclub/stripclub_0.9.1.1-1.diff.gz
stripclub_0.9.1.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/s/stripclub/stripclub_0.9.1.1-1.dsc
stripclub_0.9.1.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/stripclub/stripclub_0.9.1.1-1_i386.deb
stripclub_0.9.1.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/stripclub/stripclub_0.9.1.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated stripclub package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:56:52 -0700
Source: stripclub
Binary: stripclub
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
stripclub - Online Comic reader and archiver
Closes: 262139
Changes:
stripclub (0.9.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
.
stripclub (0.9.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* debian/rules: Upstream now uses a hand-rolled configure script, so some
changes are required, plus fixed the Copyright notice on top
.
stripclub (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* No longer uses any SDL code at all
.
stripclub (0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #262139)
* debian/control: No longer Build-Depends on anything SDL, the necessary
code is now included in the upstream tarball
Files:
2ac6d96ed2f717d43747ba2901e58be7 705 net optional stripclub_0.9.1.1-1.dsc
bf01321da3dd5f18de59a0214a3cdfd2 49158 net optional
stripclub_0.9.1.1.orig.tar.gz
f13892c15d311b2f0333c4a450d9d5d7 2438 net optional stripclub_0.9.1.1-1.diff.gz
0aff2e9ee8bb8efbbae0cb5dfc9e0a93 56722 net optional
stripclub_0.9.1.1-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkJeT0AACgkQ7Ro5M7LPzdgRcgCfR/WPY26h5aB/Gmn3phl8z8Bg
ILYAn2GO1t+aPYWHjmmo75Y9AFyxrrTe
=fLfJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
