Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:55:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 1998 17:51:36 +0000
Received: (qmail 19025 invoked from network); 21 Sep 1998 17:51:36 -0000
Received: from deborah.fuller.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 1998 17:51:36 -0000
Received: from clameter by deborah.fuller.edu with local (Exim 1.92 #1)
id 0zLA7a-0004qV-00 (Debian); Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:51:34 -0700
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rsync: --force --delete does not remove directories
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:51:34 -0700
Package: rsync
Version: 2.1.1-1
The --force option does not result in directories being deleted as documented
inthe manpage. The --delete behavior was changed AFAIK and I guess a bug was
introduced at that time.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux deborah 2.0.33 #7 Tue Feb 17 17:01:19 PST 1998 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages rsync depends on:
ii libc6 2.0.7r-2 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 26905-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 12:55:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 05:55:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cust.88.114.adsl.cistron.nl (gw.wurtel.net) [195.64.88.114]
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DM3sX-00027J-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 05:55:30 -0700
Received: from wurtel ([192.168.1.1] helo=wurtel.net)
by gw.wurtel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DM3sM-00079B-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:55:18 +0200
Received: from paul by wurtel.net with local (Exim 4.33 #1 (Debian))
id 1DM3sM-0002Xy-SA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:55:18 +0200
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:55:18 +0200
From: Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Scanner: exiscan *1DM3sM-00079B-00*PyoosTrEglw*Wurtel
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Invalid email address
> I'm sure that this had been fixed before I took over maintenance of this
> package. However, if you can show how to reproduce this bug, please let
> me know. Otherwise I'll close this bug in a week or so.
As the email address of the submitter bounces, I'm now closing this bug
report. The problem has probably been fixed anyway...
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
