Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:05:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410308: samba: Samba listing system files under backup
share
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23d-4
Severity: normal
Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
share does not exist. However, the contents of the files cannot be
readed. This bug has been found on etch and sarge systems, in amd64 and
i386 architectures.
For reproduce the bug:
smbmount //<server>/backup /a_dir
ls -l /a_dir
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 954095 2007-02-05 01:00 dpkg.status.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 265053 2007-01-29 01:00 dpkg.status.1.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 265055 2007-01-22 01:05 dpkg.status.2.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 265090 2007-01-15 01:00 dpkg.status.3.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 265095 2007-01-11 09:59 dpkg.status.4.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 265091 2007-01-01 01:00 dpkg.status.5.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 265088 2006-12-18 01:00 dpkg.status.6.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 745 2007-01-31 10:56 group.bak
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 613 2007-01-31 10:56 gshadow.bak
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 1468 2005-11-04 18:59 inetd.conf.bak
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 5073 2006-12-11 01:01 infodir.bak
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 1492 2007-01-31 10:56 passwd.bak
-rwxr-xr-x 1 daniel daniel 1100 2007-01-31 10:56 shadow.bak
backup share does not exist in smb.conf
Thanks,
Daniel.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages samba depends on:
ii debconf 1.5.11 Debian configuration
management sy
ii libacl1 2.2.41-1 Access control list shared
library
ii libattr1 2.4.32-1 Extended attribute shared
library
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared
libraries
ii libcomer 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 common error description
library
ii libcupsy 1.2.7-4 Common UNIX Printing
System(tm) -
ii libgnutl 1.4.4-3 the GNU TLS library -
runtime libr
ii libkrb53 1.4.4-6 MIT Kerberos runtime
libraries
ii libldap2 2.1.30-13.2 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpam-m 0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication
Modules f
ii libpam-r 0.79-4 Runtime support for the PAM
librar
ii libpam0g 0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication
Modules l
ii libpopt0 1.10-3 lib for parsing cmdline
parameters
ii logrotat 3.7.1-3 Log rotation utility
ii lsb-base 3.1-22 Linux Standard Base 3.1
init scrip
ii netbase 4.29 Basic TCP/IP networking
system
ii procps 1:3.2.7-3 /proc file system utilities
ii samba-co 3.0.23d-4 Samba common files used by
both th
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library -
runtime
Versions of packages samba recommends:
pn smbldap-tools <none> (no description available)
-- debconf information:
samba/run_mode: daemons
samba/tdbsam: false
samba/generate_smbpasswd: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.0.24-3
Wheen committing the change that added "valid users = %S" to the
default [homes] share, I indeed fixed that bu but, ahem, forgot to
mention this in the changelog.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
