Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:50:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428396: unclear or incorrect package dependency of
latex-svninfo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: latex-svninfo
Version: 0.4-1
Hello,
I just wanted to install the svninfo package with texlive, but the
debian package I found has tetex-bin as dependency. Is this package for
tetex only? Then tetex-svninfo would be a far better name for the
package; at least it should be mentioned in the package information. Or
is it also for texlive, then the dependencies should be adjusted to
accept also the corresponding package of texlive.
Best regards,
Simon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Monday 11 June 2007 14.23:08 Simon Dreher wrote:
> I just wanted to install the svninfo package with texlive, but the
> debian package I found has tetex-bin as dependency.
Hi,
See #422260: svninfo.sty is included in texlive-extra, so I've filed for
removal of the latex-svninfo package, no reason to have this tiny file
packaged twice for Debian.
Unfortunately, when I last looked, the version in texlive was slightly
older. If you miss something that's only in the new version, please file a
bug against texlive.
(closing this bug. I should properly mark it "wontfix", but I'd have to
close it anway when the package gets removed...)
cheers
-- vbi
--
Es ist nicht richtig, daß das das das daß in Nebensätzen ersetzt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---