Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:09:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425179: standard, but recommends optional package
checkpolicy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted
Version: 0.0.20061018-5
Severity: normal
selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted is priority standard, but it
is unusual to be found without priority optional package checkpolicy.
This means that default installations would be unusual.
I don't know whether this is a selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted
or checkpolicy bug.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Sat, 19 May 2007 16:16:34 -0400, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Package: selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted Version: 0.0.20061018-5
> Severity: normal
> selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted is priority standard, but it is
> unusual to be found without priority optional package checkpolicy.
> This means that default installations would be unusual.
I would consider a standard only installation unusual, yes.
This is not a bug.
manoj
--
A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step. Lao Tsu
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--- End Message ---
