Your message dated Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:05:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [britney] should respect versions in closed RC bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
Hello,
I just discovered that britney considered libaqbanking 1.6.2-5 to be a
valid candidate despite of bug #345631 being of severity grave and
closed for version 1.9.6.99+1.9.7beta-1 which hasn't reached sid yet.
When I closed #345631 I expected britney to detect that the bug is still
pending for the version available in sid and to keep it in sid until the
fixed version has reached sid.
Or did I misused the PTS?
Yours
Micha
P.S.: Since I was not able to reproduce bug #345631 its severity might
have been somewhat lower (i.e. important). Thus I do not ask ftp-master
to take any action concerning libaqbanking 1.6.2-5 (do what you believe
in). But that's not the issue here anyway...
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi
britney should now be able to use version tracking like you described.
Cheers
Luk
--- End Message ---
