Your message dated Fri, 6 Jul 2007 02:28:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unable to dist-upgrade unixodbc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: unixodbc
Version: 2.2.11-13
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
not sure this is a bug but here goes. Feel free to close or reassign.
This occurred on a pure etch machine.
I just did a normal update/upgrade cycle,
then a dist-upgrade,
and a couple of packages got "stuck"... see the dialogue below.
Is this an apt problem or a bug/incompat in the individual packages?
Or just normal behaviour for apt in some circumstances? I can't recall
having seen this happen before.
I am accessing packages through an apt-proxy running local to the machine.
Apt was just upgraded; unixodbc was shown as being kept back before apt
got (dist-)upgraded, and was still being kept back after that change.
At the time of the dialogue below, the verison installed was
ii apt 0.6.46.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg
And apt-proxy was
ii apt-proxy 1.9.35 Debian archive proxy and partial mirror buil
# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
gdk-imlib1 unixodbc
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
gdk-imlib1 unixodbc
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
# apt-get install unixodbc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
odbcinst1debian1
Suggested packages:
libmyodbc odbc-postgresql libct1
The following packages will be REMOVED
odbcinst1
The following NEW packages will be installed
odbcinst1debian1
The following packages will be upgraded:
unixodbc
1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 354kB of archives.
After unpacking 283kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Get: 1 http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx etch/main unixodbc 2.2.11-13 [288kB]
Get: 2 http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx etch/main odbcinst1debian1 2.2.11-13 [66.4kB]
Fetched 354kB in 3s (94.3kB/s)
(Reading database ... 109840 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace unixodbc 2.2.4-11 (using .../unixodbc_2.2.11-13_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement unixodbc ...
(Reading database ... 109835 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing odbcinst1 ...
Selecting previously deselected package odbcinst1debian1.
(Reading database ... 109814 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking odbcinst1debian1 (from .../odbcinst1debian1_2.2.11-13_i386.deb) ...
Setting up odbcinst1debian1 (2.2.11-13) ...
Setting up unixodbc (2.2.11-13) ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages unixodbc depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libltdl3 1.5.22-4 A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii libreadline5 5.2-1 GNU readline and history libraries
ii odbcinst1debian1 2.2.11-13 Support library and helper program
unixodbc recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Vince,
Sorry, I don't know why unixodbc wasn't upgraded for you in a dist-upgrade
run. Maybe an apt configuration setting, a package on hold somewhere, or a
bug in apt? I'm confident that whatever this was, it was not a bug in
unixodbc; and no one else has reported this behavior; so I think this bug
should simply be closed since even if there were anything to fix here it
won't be fixed in etch at this point and doesn't matter for lenny.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--- End Message ---
