Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:35:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285654: G_BREAKPOINT is broken if not i386 or alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtk-gnutella
Version: 0.95-1
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg -L gtk-gnutella|grep bin
/usr/bin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg -L gtk-gnutella
/.
/usr
/usr/bin
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/gtk-gnutella
/usr/share/doc/gtk-gnutella/copyright
/usr/share/doc/gtk-gnutella/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/gtk-gnutella/README.debian
/usr/share/doc/gtk-gnutella/TODO
/usr/share/doc/gtk-gnutella/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/bogons.txt
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/gwcache.boot
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/geo-ip.txt
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/hostiles.txt
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/arrow_down.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/arrow_up.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/booklib.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/booksha.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/bookshav.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/clanbomber_red.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/clanbomber_yellow.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/download.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/exit.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/filter.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/firewall.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/firewall_punchable.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/firewall_tcp.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/firewall_udp.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/firewall_udp_punchable.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/freeze.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/icon.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/leaf.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/legacy.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/no_firewall.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/offline.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/online.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/save.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/smallserver.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/stock_form-time-field-16.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/thaw.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/ultra.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/upload.xpm
/usr/share/gtk-gnutella/pixmaps/warning.xpm
/usr/share/locale
/usr/share/locale/de
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gtk-gnutella.mo
/usr/share/locale/es
/usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES
/usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gtk-gnutella.mo
/usr/share/locale/fr
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gtk-gnutella.mo
/usr/share/locale/ja
/usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES
/usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/gtk-gnutella.mo
/usr/share/locale/nl
/usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES
/usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/gtk-gnutella.mo
/usr/share/locale/hu
/usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES
/usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/gtk-gnutella.mo
/usr/share/applications
/usr/share/applications/gtk-gnutella.desktop
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/menu
/usr/lib/menu/gtk-gnutella
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (102, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBvM4hWoGvjmrbsgARAhycAJ9Hr0XHIKvAT5NZFsyqY3phCt74BgCgp25K
zaVpFb9XChurxkMvVUevfLM=
=Yskm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 18:07:23 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Do you have a strong objection to that and want to argue with upstream
> > to get this changed,
>
> Taking the lack of a response as a "no".
>
> > or set this bug as WONTFIX/close it ?
>
> Updating the report's status accordingly.
I'm closing this bug report now as there were no further report of this
issue and there's a way to use G_BREAKPOINT() (include signal.h).
--
Loïc Minier
--- End Message ---
