Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:29:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fw: Bug#305660: sorry
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 08:34:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 01:34:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.iasi.roedu.net (iasi.roedu.net) [192.129.4.100] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DOX9A-0001YT-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:34:52 -0700
Received: from draco.iasi.roedu.net (draco.iasi.roedu.net [192.129.4.126])
        by iasi.roedu.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3L8YmW7023980;
        Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:34:48 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by draco.iasi.roedu.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
        id 1B0E29E7F; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:34:48 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Subredu Manuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libdbi0: segfault
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:34:47 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libdbi0
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libdbi0 depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

any program who's using libdbi0/libdbi0-dev segfaults when trying to read the 
error
message from libdbi.

 eg:

  void open_db()
  {
     const char * errmsg;
     dbi_conn     conn;

     /* initialize, set_params */

     if ( dbi_conn_connect(conn) < 0 ) {
        dbi_conn_error(conn, &errmsg);
        printf("error connecting to db\n%s\n", errmsg);
        exit(1);
     }
  }

  ltrace output on a program using that code sample looks like this:

  __libc_start_main(0x8048cde, 1, 0xbffffcb4, 0x8048d80, 0x8048de0 <unfinished 
...>
  dbi_initialize(0, 0x804a164, 0xbffffc08, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = 2
  dbi_conn_new(0x8048f41, 0x804a164, 0xbffffc08, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = 0
  dbi_conn_set_option(0, 0x8048f50, 0x8048f46, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = -1
  dbi_conn_set_option(0, 0x8048f5c, 0x8048f55, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = -1
  dbi_conn_set_option(0, 0x8048f6a, 0x8048f65, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = -1
  dbi_conn_set_option(0, 0x8048f7f, 0x8048f73, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = -1
  dbi_conn_connect(0, 0x8048f7f, 0x8048f73, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70) = -1
  dbi_conn_error(0, 0xbffffc04, 0x8048f73, 0x80486c5, 0xb7fc3e70 <unfinished 
...>
  --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
  +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
  

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305660-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 16:30:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 09:30:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net [68.230.241.36] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DOeZU-0002Vn-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:30:32 -0700
Received: from hypnotic.neongoat.com ([68.6.90.242])
          by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:29:53 -0400
Received: from zeitgeist.neongoat.com ([192.168.0.20]:41930 helo=zeitgeist)
        by hypnotic.neongoat.com with smtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DOeYq-0006qa-3u
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:29:52 -0700
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:29:52 -0700
From: David Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fw: Bug#305660: sorry
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Neon Goat Productions
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0-gtk2-20041224 (GTK+ 2.6.2; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,FW,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:59:01 +0300
From: Subredu Manuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#305660: sorry



 I'm sorry. It was my fault. I didn't specified the correct driver (I
had psql instead of pgsql).



--
David Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Neon Goat Productions
http://www.neongoat.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to