Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:40:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305718: squid: Since upgrading Squid occasionally refuses 
connections.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 17:41:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 10:41:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe0080c8dea396-cm0011ae01fcde.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com 
(neuromancer) [69.197.189.36] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DOfgB-0002YU-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:41:31 -0700
Received: from luke by neuromancer with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DOfg1-00036M-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:41:21 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luke Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: squid: Since upgrading Squid occasionally refuses connections.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:41:20 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Luke Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: squid
Version: 2.5.9-5
Severity: normal

Since upgrading to the 2.5.9-5 package of Squid, the daemon now
occasionally refuses proxy connections on it's listening port (3128 in
my configuration).  The clients using Squid see an error about not being
able to contact the proxy server, and the problem dissapears after a few
seconds.  Nothing appeared in the system log or any of the Squid logs
(access, cache and store).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages squid depends on:
ii  adduser                     3.63         Add and remove users and groups
ii  coreutils                   5.2.1-2      The GNU core utilities
ii  debconf                     1.4.48       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libldap2                    2.1.30-6     OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpam0g                    0.76-22      Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  logrotate                   3.7-2        Log rotation utility
ii  netbase                     4.21         Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  squid-common                2.5.9-5      Internet Object Cache (WWW proxy c

-- debconf information:
  squid/fix_cachedir_perms: false
  squid/largefiles_warning:
  squid/anonymize_headers:
  squid/authenticate_program:
  squid-cgi/cachemgr:
  squid/fix_lines: true
  squid/old_version: false
  squid/http_anonymizer:

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305718-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 19:41:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 12:41:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms001msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.51] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DOhYD-0000uP-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:41:25 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (23.21.172.54) by ms001msg.fastwebnet.it 
(7.2.052.3)
        id 4235CA07007B8D7A; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:40:54 +0200
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id F1A814BA8F; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:40:54 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#305718: squid: Since upgrading Squid occasionally refuses
        connections.
From: Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luke Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UFK5lnvgettBptjp/YBB"
Organization: Debian
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:40:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-UFK5lnvgettBptjp/YBB
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Il giorno gio, 21/04/2005 alle 15.32 -0400, Luke Reeves ha scritto:
> Hm, I checked the log and found assertion failures:
> 2005/04/21 15:26:00| assertion failed: store_swapout.c:232:
> "mem->inmem_lo =3D=3D 0"

Exactly. You can see

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D305615
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D305617

This has been fixed in 2.5.9-6. No need to make changes to configuration
file.

Regards,=20

--=20
 Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972  C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26

--=-UFK5lnvgettBptjp/YBB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCaAHG8ZumGJJMDCYRAq6kAJ9LhdqhwQmYq+jfDi/kkTVBWBb9bwCZAau+
r6oNIEo8NR+41S0axhXfxgY=
=3sj1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UFK5lnvgettBptjp/YBB--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to