Your message dated Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:54:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305929: Isn't there a contradiction between NEWS and
README.Debian?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2005 23:34:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 16:34:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mtaout5.barak.net.il [212.150.49.175]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DP7ew-0006g0-00; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:34:06 -0700
Received: from rakefet ([85.64.197.221])
by mtaout5.barak.net.il (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02
(built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:36:16 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from shaul by rakefet with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DP7eE-0005sC-IR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Apr 2005
02:33:22 +0300
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:33:22 +0300
From: Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Isn't there a contradiction between NEWS and README.Debian?
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.3-20050321+1
Severity: normal
Even though you state in the NEWS file that
Now users must arrange for the ethernet interface used for PPPoE
to be up.
you are still suggesting only
auto myisp
iface myisp inet ppp
provider dsl-provider
in README.Debian file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1.pentium1.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages ppp depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpcap0.7 0.7.2-7 System interface for user-level pa
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii makedev 2.3.1-77 creates device files in /dev
ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii procps 1:3.2.1-2 The /proc file system utilities
-- debconf information:
ppp/maxfail:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305929-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2005 23:55:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 16:55:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DP7zQ-0003fZ-00; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:55:16 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 8F8F45F710; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id B1DBA1C2E0; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:54:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:54:50 +0200
To: Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#305929: Isn't there a contradiction between NEWS and
README.Debian?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Apr 23, Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you are still suggesting only
>=20
> auto myisp
> iface myisp inet ppp
> provider dsl-provider
>=20
> in README.Debian file.
Explaining how to configure an ethernet interface is not a task for the
ppp package.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCaY7KFGfw2OHuP7ERAh0bAKCDl2vzsz7fHC5dEoSj6U+Ef7gWxQCggg0H
mEJ15LY4crU5ZbLRPBOU55o=
=42Nb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
