Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:28:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305941: marked as done (ppp broken on Sarge)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2005 01:29:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 18:29:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jive.softhome.net [66.54.152.27]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DP9Sd-0005zP-00; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:29:31 -0700
Received: (qmail 26522 invoked by uid 417); 23 Apr 2005 01:29:30 -0000
Received: from shunt-smtp-out-0 (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.3.12)
by shunt-smtp-out-0 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2005 01:29:30 -0000
Received: from dsl-cust-243.southkent.net ([64.39.162.243])
(AUTH: PLAIN [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by softhome.net with esmtp; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:29:30 -0600
From: WolfCub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: WolfCorp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ppp broken on Sarge
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:25:51 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: pppoeconf, pppoe
Version: version 1.6, version 3.5-4
I upgraded my systems via apt-get yesterday, to find ppp_on_boot and pppoe
broken on sarge. Before the upgrade, ppp_on_boot automatically connected the
systems to the Internet upon bootup. Now, upon boot, this does not happen.
I tried to run "pon" to connect, however that no longer worked either. I
have to run pppoeconf every time I boot just to get online.
I am running Sarge on kernel 2.6.11. Things worked great before the upgrade.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305941-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 22:29:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 15:29:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DPpbj-0004tu-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:29:43 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3E3385F840; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:29:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 715301C2EC; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:28:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:28:37 +0200
To: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#305941: marked as done (ppp broken on Sarge)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Apr 23, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So my question is: WTF? Upstream refused a good think. Fine. So you
> trust the upstream more than your own sanity?
He provided an argument good enough to persuade me, and I never liked
this patch anyway.
The patch has never been in a released package, so your arguments
about SC violations is not relevant.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCbB2VFGfw2OHuP7ERApQTAJ4kT/AgeokblONZgwOVAd38RYYBjQCfazH9
cQuQ1LQjArhl3187o+PYKmE=
=lM2L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
