Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:47:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306016: fixed in fuse 2.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2005 17:12:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 23 10:12:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (futura.tixteam.net) [213.174.176.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DPOBD-0000M7-00; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:12:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by futura.tixteam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79028B0D89
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:12:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from futura.tixteam.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (futura [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 12172-07 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:12:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tie (ip-146-243.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.146.243])
by futura.tixteam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027A4B0D74
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:12:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tie (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:13:13 -0700
Received: by tie (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1000);
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:13:13 -0700
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:13:13 -0700
From: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fuse-source: doesn't build as non-root
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050423:[EMAIL PROTECTED]::NMR18hBsxDPmSIZE:000000000000000
0000000000000000000000007JBB
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at quaqua.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: fuse-source
Version: 2.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Hi, I was trying to build the fuse module, as a normal user and passing
the --rootcmd option, and the build failed:
dh_testroot: You must run this as root (or use fakeroot).
make[1]: *** [binary-modules] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fuse'
Module /usr/src/modules/fuse failed.
Perhaps /usr/src/modules/fuse does not understand --rootcmd?
If you see messages that indicate that it is not
in fact being built as root, please file a bug
against /usr/src/modules/fuse.
Probably the fuse source needs to use the rootcmd option, when passed!
Thanks,
Guido
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11tie-a
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages fuse-source depends on:
ii altgcc [c-compiler] 1:2.7.2.3-2 Alternate gcc package for the libc
ii bzip2 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii debhelper 4.2.32 helper programs for debian/rules
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-3 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU C compiler
ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the "make" util
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306016-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 10:53:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 03:53:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQNgk-00017E-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 03:53:10 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQNbB-0004vw-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:47:25 -0400
From: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306016: fixed in fuse 2.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:47:25 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: fuse
Source-Version: 2.2.1-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
fuse-source_2.2.1-5_all.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-source_2.2.1-5_all.deb
fuse-utils_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-utils_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
fuse_2.2.1-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.2.1-5.diff.gz
fuse_2.2.1-5.dsc
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.2.1-5.dsc
libfuse-dev_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse-dev_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
libfuse2_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse2_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fuse package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:43:18 +0200
Source: fuse
Binary: libfuse2 libfuse-dev fuse-utils fuse-source
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.2.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
fuse-source - Filesystem in USErspace (source for kernel module)
fuse-utils - Filesystem in USErspace (utilities)
libfuse-dev - Filesystem in USErspace (development files)
libfuse2 - Filesystem in USErspace library
Closes: 298825 306016
Changes:
fuse (2.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Now allows to be built as non-root (Closes: #306016)
Thanks for Guido Trotter for spotting this.
* Applied patch provided by Euan MacGregor (Closes: #298825)
Should fix problems with dpkg-statoverride.
Files:
41e8a8fd9513e049041f1e2ef7063b5e 626 libs optional fuse_2.2.1-5.dsc
2436f0fee9cee4721a55c00ba9bf9e1e 10360 libs optional fuse_2.2.1-5.diff.gz
05bdef60ae5e1b39a25da402bad1c7a1 39816 utils optional
fuse-utils_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
9a9b69a565bac65718ef27a10c7a3441 53328 libdevel optional
libfuse-dev_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
519cdcc36ee6b8946b2290f6b38c1ddd 32488 libs optional libfuse2_2.2.1-5_i386.deb
4f6d305308863ac1cc5a217784354250 80064 utils optional
fuse-source_2.2.1-5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCbhSvhQui3hP+/EARAmI2AJ4350uTBRJNeCKyWUCD1LOaYX06MwCgvE4x
GpDyJbgnaDSaa3K5fTkmXMM=
=Q2tm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
