Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:55:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316708: Versions.hs patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: darcs-buildpackage
Version: 0.5.3
Severity: normal
In Version.hs there is no handling of the epoch of a debian package. For
example for a package with upstream version 0.90 and debian version
1:0.90-3 darcs-buildpackage wants to find upstream version 1:0.90.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-my
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to it_IT.UTF-8)
Versions of packages darcs-buildpackage depends on:
ii darcs 1.0.3-1 an advanced revision control syste
ii darcs-load-dirs 1.0.24 Import upstream archives into darc
ii devscripts 2.8.14 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.10 Package building tools for Debian
darcs-buildpackage recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.5.9
Hello!
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:40:23 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:04:23 +0200, John Goerzen wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:04:08PM -0400, Francois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>>> I've modified Versions.hs to remove the epoch in the version
>>> number. It may not be the way to go but it seems to be working
>>> locally at least. Here is the full file.
>>
>> Thank you for the patch. I have applied this in my darcs
>> repository and will build a new package shortly.
>
> I guess you forgot to close this bug (and adding a note in the
> debian/changelog) with update 0.5.9, because:
> =====
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ darcs get http://darcs.complete.org/darcs-buildpackage
> [...]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd darcs-buildpackage
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ darcs --changes
> [...]
>
> Fri Oct 20 17:43:28 CEST 2006 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> tagged DEBIAN_darcs-buildpackage_0.5.9
>
> Fri Oct 20 17:40:42 CEST 2006 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Switch from MissingH.Printf to Text.Printf
>
> Fri Oct 20 17:40:12 CEST 2006 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Build dep on regex-compat
>
> Fri Oct 20 17:39:48 CEST 2006 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Debian updates for GHC 6.6
>
> Tue Oct 17 17:03:19 CEST 2006 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Support epochs
> #316708, patch from Francois-Denis Gonthier
> [...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
> =====
>
> If you don't reply in one week from now, I'll close the bug with the
> following pseudo-header and a mail to -done:
>
> Version: 0.5.9
Done.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
--- End Message ---
