Your message dated Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:35:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440905: bashbug: tries to use rmail but it's not in PATH
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: bash
Version: 3.1dfsg-8
Severity: normal

My MTA is exim 3.36-18.2. bashbug looks for /usr/lib/sendmail or
/usr/sbin/sendmail and then falls back to "rmail". This won't work
since the rmail symlink is in /usr/sbin/rmail which is not in the PATH
of a normal user. Is there some /etc/alternatives style symlink that
would always be present and allow programs to send email regardless of
the MTA?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages bash depends on:
ii  base-files             4                 Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii  debianutils            2.17              Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6                  2.3.6.ds1-13etch2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libncurses5            5.5-5             Shared libraries for terminal hand

bash recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 440905 not-a-bug
thanks

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:15:06PM +0300, Timo Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > /usr/sbin/sendmail is apparently in Debian policy and the FHS.  If it
> > didn't work since that's missing, then it's allowed to not work, since
> > the system is no longer consistent with the assumptions one is allowed
> > to make on a Debian system.
> 
> Sorry, please close this. I was accidentally inside the wrong chroot
> that has no mail configuration (not even exim). (I used chroot so I
> could test the bug against the latest version of bash).
Sure, done.  In the future you can close the bugs yourself by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; see the rest of the BTS documentation for the other
manipulations.

Justin

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to