Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing spam pseudo-package bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2000 21:44:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 17 16:44:06 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay03.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.183] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
        id 13EIgI-0003tE-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:44:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 20659 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 21:44:04 -0000
Received: from dsl-234-232-186-216.cust.dslnetworks.net (HELO arroz.fake) 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by relay03.netaddress.usa.net with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 21:44:04 -0000
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
        id D4AF393802; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:56:35 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Re: Our Information  We offer PE-AL 
composite pipe from China
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 17 Jul 2000 17:56:35 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 96
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--=-=-=


Package: spam


--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:44:13 -0400
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 0)
        id 7349593802; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgw.onshore.com (mailgw.onshore.com [206.69.89.32])
        by queso.onshore.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
JAA15370
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:27:51 -0500
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.234.231.5])
        by mailgw.onshore.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id 
JAA01210
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:27:22 -0500
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
        id 13EBs2-0001ZZ-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:27:46 -0500
Received: (qmail 12778 invoked by uid 38); 17 Jul 2000 14:27:15 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 12662 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 14:27:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sina.com) (202.106.187.166)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 14:27:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 29465 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 14:27:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (202.105.18.30)
  by 202.106.187.166 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 14:27:57 -0000
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:20:26 +0800
Subject: Re: Our Information  We offer PE-AL composite pipe from China
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Ri Feng
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/12207
X-Loop: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:27:46 -0500
X-UIDL: b0eb6e61e4459c0e23225efb75db3158

Dear Sir,

We are glad to have learned your e-mail address from the  http://www.untpdc.org 
BBS and we are writing to you with the hope of  establishing a long-term 
relations.

We, Foshan Rifeng Enterprise Co., Ltd. are a new & Hi-tech enterprise  in 
Guangdong 
Province, China. With production technology and equipment  imported from Europe 
since 1994, Rifeng Enterprise manufacturers and  markets the world 90' most 
advanced 
Rifeng Unipipe. Up to now it has  been built into the largest manufacturing 
base 
of PE-AL composite pipe  in China.

With all imported raw material and complying with ASTM standards F1282  and 
F1281 
in its manufacturer and productions, tested by national  authorities, Rifeng 
Unipipe's quality meets completely or even better  than that of USA and 
European 
Similar products. With tests by the  national authoritative institutes, Rifeng 
Unipipe has been granted the  fames of: National New product, National 
Technology 
Achievement Key  Promotion Project, National Torch Planning Project, National 
Hi-living  Standard Dwelling Construction Recommended Product, China 
Engineering 
 Construction Recommended Product.

Satisfying customers and fine quality are vital to Rifeng Company, with  
continuous 
technology innovations, the company wishes to make friends  all over the world, 
to a bright future.

For more information, please kindly contact us.

We are looking forward to your favorable reply.

Best regards,

Jason Wong

Foshan Rifeng Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Tel: +86-757-3982 666
Fax: +86-757-2283 667
Http://www.rifeng.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--=-=-=


-- 
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

--=-=-=--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 67368-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 08:00:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 01:00:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DR3wi-0002SG-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:29 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j3S80OXE017933
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:28 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j3S80N6E017931;
        Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:23 -0700
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:23 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: closing spam pseudo-package bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11

Examining the closed bugs on the spam pseudo-package, it appears that
it was created to reassign bugs created by spam to it.  The BTS is now
picker on bug creation message format and that does not happen.

It looks like two people decieded to forward spam sent to debian
mailing lists to the psuedo-package, but I can't see how that was ever
usefull.

I'm closing this 5 year old mess.

-- 
Blars Blarson                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to