Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing spam pseudo-package bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2000 20:17:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 25 15:17:59 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay03.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.183]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 136Iqt-0003bk-00; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:17:59 -0500
Received: (qmail 26461 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2000 20:17:58 -0000
Received: from dsl-234-232-186-216.cust.dslnetworks.net (HELO arroz.fake)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by relay03.netaddress.usa.net with SMTP; 25 Jun 2000 20:17:58 -0000
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 8198293802; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:27:44 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ["Li Bang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Looking forward to your favorable reply
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 Jun 2000 16:27:43 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 98
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=-=-=
Package: spam
Version: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:21:56 +0800
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 03:39:46 -0400
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 9C88493802; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 03:39:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgw.onshore.com (mailgw.onshore.com [206.69.89.32])
by queso.onshore.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id CAA23=
383
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 02:21:41 +0200
Rece=
ived: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.234.231.5])
by mailgw.onshore.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id CAA0=
3268
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 02:16:51 -0500
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]=20
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 135Nov-0008LO-00; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 02:24:09 -0500
Received: (qmail 8599 invoked by uid 38); 23 Jun 2000 07:22:59 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 8139 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2000 07:22:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pub.nanhai.net.cn) (202.104.16.67)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2000 07:22:52 -0000
Received: from localhost ([202.104.17.60])
by pub.nanhai.net.cn (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00363
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:18:12 +0800 (C=
ST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Li Bang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:21:56 +0800
Subject: Looking forward to your favorable reply
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Diso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 5
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/11960
X-Loop: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 02:24:09 -0500
X-UIDL: e9a42aadb39607a5f0b56432236db351
Dear Sir or Madam,
We are glad to have learn your company from the web. We are writing to =
you with=20
the hope of establishing the business relations with you.=20
We are Kitchen electrical utensils manfacturer offering high-quality pr=
oducts=20
at competitive price. Our main product includs Rice Cookers=A1=A2Electr=
ic Woks and=20
Mini Kitchen Appliances, and our new product is Grill and Barbecue.
Our company was certified by ISO9002 in 1998, carried out =A1=B0T.W.Q.A=
.=A1=B1. =A1=B05S=A1=B1 and=20
=A1=B0Q.C.C.=A1=B1 in 1999 and will carry out =A1=B0T.Q.M.=A1=B1 in 200=
0.=20
The products of the company have already got the authentications of CCE=
E of China,=20
UL and ETL of America and GS of Germany.
If this meets your interest, please do not hesitate to contact us.
I am looking forward to your favorable reply.
Best regards,
Roc P. Wang
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LiBang Electronic Co., Ltd
Huanzhen Rd,=20
Yanbu Town, Nanhai City,
Guangdong Province 538247
China
Tel: +86-757-6239 656
Fax: +86-757-6336 141
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Person: Roc P. Wang
--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an.org
--=-=-=
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--=-=-=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 66248-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 08:00:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 01:00:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR3wi-0002SG-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:29 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id
j3S80OXE017933
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:28 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j3S80N6E017931;
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:23 -0700
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:00:23 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: closing spam pseudo-package bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7
Examining the closed bugs on the spam pseudo-package, it appears that
it was created to reassign bugs created by spam to it. The BTS is now
picker on bug creation message format and that does not happen.
It looks like two people decieded to forward spam sent to debian
mailing lists to the psuedo-package, but I can't see how that was ever
usefull.
I'm closing this 5 year old mess.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
