Your message dated Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:27:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old 'oops' bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: oops
Version: 1.5.19.cvs.20010818-0.1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1) specifies that if both a Host header and a full
URI are specified in the request selector, the full URI should be
honored and the Host header MUST be ignored.

However, oops passes along the Host header to the upstream server,
which leads to weirdness.  For example, this request:

GET http://packages.debian.org/reportbug HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:3128
Connection: close

results in a 404.

(oops also violates the RFC by processing this request if the Host
header is omitted, instead of sending a 400 response code.)

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux host251 2.4.19-pre1-ac2 #1 Thu Feb 28 09:28:24 CST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages oops depends on:
ii  debconf                    1.0.31        Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                      2.2.5-3       GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb2                     2:2.7.7.0-3.1 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii  libpcre3                   3.4-1.1       Philip Hazel's Perl Compatible Reg



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oops

Dear submitter,

Oops has been removed from debian/unstable on 19 Aug 2007 as documented
in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438648. I'm
therefore closing the bugs as directed by the removal notification.

Thanks again for your interest in the oops package. I'm sorry that this
package was in such a bad shape, therefore I think removing it was the
best way to deal with the package.


-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to