Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:48:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I hope it fixed in 2.0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 2.0.0-1
http://www.balabit.com/dl/html/syslog-ng-admin-guide_en.html/ch08s01.html#sourcecommonopts
declares a couple of options, which have been previously available as
global options or only as local option for some sources (e.g. log_prefix
has been available for the file()-source only).
http://osdir.com/ml/syslog-ng/2005-06/msg00138.html also verifies this
reading, that such log_prefix became a general source-specific option
in syslog-ng 1.9.x, available to all source drivers.
However, a configuration like this:
source s_chroot{
unix-stream("/home/jail1/dev/log" log_prefix("jail1: "));
};
is rejected by syslog-ng with the error message "syntax error at 91"
(use "syslog-ng -s" to verify the config).
To resolve this issue for me, I've recompiled the source by fetching
http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/syslog-ng/sources/stable/src/syslog-ng-2.0.5.tar.gz,
installing the depency packages (devscripts debhelper libevtlog-dev
libnet1-dev libglib2.0-dev pkg-config) from etch and recompiled the
package by running "dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc" on the source
before installing it using "dpkg -i ../syslog-ng_2.0.5_i386.deb".
The recompiled package works without this issue.
I didn't find any update on this in the upstream changelog or NEWS-file,
so maybe this issue only shows up on Debian boxes (or has been silently
fixed in a release later than 2.0.0).
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, kernel 2.6.22.4 and libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.5-1
As it has been written in the report it disappeared in the version
2.0.5-1.
--- End Message ---
