Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:42:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libqca2 now is in source package qca2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qca
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Yes please. But also notice to not replace current qca in unstable with qca2.
> I don't know yet what's the best solution. put qca2 as qca in experimental -
> or package it as qca2 in unstable.
This seems to be an interesting question: It was also raised at ubuntu,
see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qca/+bug/128505
It may be useful for mailody (and perhaps other software outside the
repository) to keep qca1 around in parallel to qca2.
While libqca1c2 and libqca2 can be installed at the same time, they can
not both be in the same release if they come from different versions of
the same source package.
Therefore I consider moving version 2 of qca to a different source
package named qca2. Opinions?
Jan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
...which I just uploaded to unstable.
Jan
--- End Message ---
