Your message dated Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:40:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452125: Add two packages to build depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdiff3
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
How about to add "libacl1-dev" and "libattr1-dev" to Build-Depends ?
(it's the only ubuntu difference).
http://patches.ubuntu.com/k/kdiff3/kdiff3_0.9.92-1ubuntu1.patch
Thanks
Marco Rodrigues
--
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.92-2
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> How about to add "libacl1-dev" and "libattr1-dev" to Build-Depends ?
> (it's the only ubuntu difference).
I don't know if KDiff3 makes any use of ACL stuff, but as
the package's build-dependency kdelibs4-dev depends on
libacl1-dev as well as libattr1-dev, it should be unnecessary
to have a direct build-dependency.
Please reopen the bug if I'm wrong (and tell me why).
Ciao,
Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
