Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 14:14:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot
find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 10:28:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 02 03:28:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c169155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.169.155]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSY9u-0002rm-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 03:28:14 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DSYAD-0005Ni-9X; Mon, 02 May 2005 12:28:35 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol
declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:28:35 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: addresses-for-gnustep
Version: 0.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
When building 'addresses-for-gnustep' on i386/testing,
I get the following error:
gcc VCFViewer.m -c \
-MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1
-DGNU_RUNTIME=1 -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DGSWARN
-DGSDIAGNOSE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fgnu-runtime -Wall
-fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString
-I/addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Frameworks -I. -I/root/GNUstep/Library/Headers
-I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers
-I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Network/Library/Headers
-I/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers \
-o shared_obj/VCFViewer.o
In file included from VCFViewer.m:16:
VCFViewer.h:17:47: warning: GWorkspace/ContentViewersProtocol.h: No such file
or directory
In file included from VCFViewer.m:16:
VCFViewer.h:25: error: cannot find protocol declaration for
`ContentViewersProtocol'
make[3]: *** [shared_obj/VCFViewer.o] Error 1
With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled
on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep
in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably
not enter sarge because of #304968.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../../addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Goodies/GNUmakefile
./Goodies/GNUmakefile
--- ../../addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Goodies/GNUmakefile 2005-04-29
22:06:30.117828958 +0200
+++ ./Goodies/GNUmakefile 2005-04-29 22:07:22.816817494 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make
SUBPROJECTS = \
- VCFViewer \
adgnumailconverter \
adserver \
adtool
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307290-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 12:14:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 05:14:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DU1ik-00013D-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 05:14:19 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.1] (lan31-6-82-230-27-192.fbx.proxad.net
[82.230.27.192])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4AC1734D3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 6 May 2005 14:14:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 14:14:16 +0200
From: Eric Heintzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find
protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol'
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>
>
>>>>>With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled
>>>>>on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep
>>>>>in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably
>>>>>not enter sarge because of #304968.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
>>>>#304968 will be closed when gnustep-back will be a valid candidate (in 2
>>>>days).
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>>>gnustep-back is a valid candidate tomorrow; you ought to close this bug
>>>now.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>What bug should I close now :
>>#304968 (gnustep-base)
>>or #307290 (addresses-for-gnustep)
>>or both ?
>>
>>
>
>If what you want is for gnustep-{base,back,gui} to go in when gnustep-back
>is a valid candidate, then you should close 304968 now.
>
>And then 307290 can be closed once they're all accepted into testing.
>
>
Done
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
