Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:52:55 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341874: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Hi,

whereas I would like to continue packaging rscheme I don't feel I have
gotten on a good foot with this package. This is opposed to the upstream
author, Donovan Kolbly, which is a very helpful person indeed :)

I wouldve liked to delve deeper into rschemes build process, but I just
don't find the time - and this needs to be done io. to get modules to
buld nicely. Upstream is aware of the problem, and will help you with
what he can. Rscheme is being used in Askemos, which is a very
interesting twin-project. Jörg from Askemos is also helpful, and helps
write rscheme.

I suspect Donovan will have a fix for the RC Bug (FTBFS against alpha).

I wont be RFA'ing this for very long before I orphan it. Say end og
january.

Regards,
Lars

-----------------<boilerplate>------------------------
The package description is:
 RScheme is a scheme interpreter and compiler with object extensions,
 threads, a persistent store, an optional real-time garbage collector,
 and many other nifty features.
 .
 RScheme can generate byte compiled modules, or compile directly to C.
 This is quite easy with the current configuration.  See
 /usr/doc/rscheme/module-example for an example.
 .
 More information can be found at the rscheme home page
 http://www.rscheme.org.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=no_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=no_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   rscheme | 0.7.3.4.b3-4 | source, alpha, amd64, i386, m68k, powerpc, s390

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to