Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:56:20 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug 452046 not found in testing or unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libkrb5-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Cannot install due to slight dependency mismatch. Output below:
# apt-get install libkrb5-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libkrb5-dev: Depends: libkrb53 (= 1.4.4-7etch1) but 1.4.4-7etch2 is to be
installed
Depends: libkadm55 (= 1.4.4-7etch1) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-xenU
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.4.4-8
This bug isn't present in testing or unstable, and 1.4.4-8 is the lowest
version in unstable (hurd-i386).
Also, submitter, are you using the security archive? It appears that
the newest versions in the security archive are 1.4.4-7etch4, and all
the dependencies appear to be up-to-date there. Could you please check
and report back to the bug?
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
a typesetting engine: http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc/code/thwack
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
