Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 05:49:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306711: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.0.19-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 06:03:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 23:03:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hail.vislab.usyd.edu.au [129.78.157.20] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DR27q-0004oL-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:03:50 -0700
Received: from moth.vislab.usyd.edu.au (moth.vislab.usyd.edu.au 
[129.78.157.169])
        by hail.vislab.usyd.edu.au (Postfix) with SMTP id BF8354AD;
        Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:03:47 +1000 (EST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 7753 invoked by uid 1782);
        Thu, 28 Apr 2005 06:03:47 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sb-bsd-sockets build also failing on AMD64?
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.10
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:03:47 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.0.0-1
Severity: normal

As with other builds (ppc) sb-bsd-sockets appears
to be failing on AMD64:

-----------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:microag$ sbcl
This is SBCL 0.9.0, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.

SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (require 'sb-bsd-sockets)

debugger invoked on a SB-INT:EXTENSION-FAILURE in thread 7610:
  Don't know how to REQUIRE SB-BSD-SOCKETS.
  See also:
    The SBCL Manual, Variable *MODULE-PROVIDER-FUNCTIONS*
    The SBCL Manual, Function REQUIRE

Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.

restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
  0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.

(SB-IMPL::REQUIRE-ERROR "Don't know how to ~S ~A.")
0]
-------------

Cheers,
Steve

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages sbcl depends on:
ii  common-lisp-controller      4.12         This is a Common Lisp source and c
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sbcl-common                 1:0.9.0.0-1  Architecture independent files for

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306711-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 09:53:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 02:53:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DULze-0004jP-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 02:53:07 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DULvk-0005Zc-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 05:49:04 -0400
From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306711: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.0.19-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 05:49:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: sbcl
Source-Version: 1:0.9.0.19-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sbcl-common_0.9.0.19-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.0.19-1_all.deb
sbcl_0.9.0.19-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.0.19-1.diff.gz
sbcl_0.9.0.19-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.0.19-1.dsc
sbcl_0.9.0.19-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.0.19-1_i386.deb
sbcl_0.9.0.19.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.0.19.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sbcl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  6 May 2005 07:15:31 +0200
Source: sbcl
Binary: sbcl sbcl-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.9.0.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 sbcl       - A development environment for Common Lisp
 sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL
Closes: 302355 306711
Changes: 
 sbcl (1:0.9.0.19-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Upstream bugfix for 0.9.0.0 release.
   * Now build with all build-time checks disabled! But rebuild sbcl
     with itself, thus testing the newly build sbcl
     Closes: #306711, #302355
   * Now loads /etc/sbcl.rc also. Found by Fare'.
Files: 
 efdfdc004134c92c40ecdc6b7af7c364 673 devel optional sbcl_0.9.0.19-1.dsc
 d9a715e9f074b4ca5e243f192eafdc85 3080770 devel optional 
sbcl_0.9.0.19.orig.tar.gz
 982d04086a2ac3f72ef1638bb27cd353 33704 devel optional sbcl_0.9.0.19-1.diff.gz
 a1c2488409e23b9810cee2d12bc94817 3307124 devel optional 
sbcl-common_0.9.0.19-1_all.deb
 74fd28c6caf8aacec1096826e369ce8e 8009996 devel optional 
sbcl_0.9.0.19-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCfHeD11ldN0tyliURAtiHAJ4l54gQwEaCqlllsvEPB7QmXrrKmQCfWAkX
PNKNhnvimEU1wh5xB55vZcE=
=ChaY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to