Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 20:31:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#178038: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2003 13:34:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 23 07:34:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pasky.ji.cz (machine.sinus.cz) [62.44.12.54]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bhVD-0000Qe-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:34:43 -0600
Received: (qmail 13683 invoked by uid 2001); 23 Jan 2003 13:34:40 -0000
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:34:40 +0100
From: Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Too many dependencies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: elinks
Version: 0.3.20021004
The package maintains a number of required dependencies, which make it very
difficult to use on small systems, even though elinks can do just fine with
only libc6 dependency fulfilled. GPM support, GNUTLS support, Lua support,
title setting support (which is especially grotesque --- you need X11 installed
in order to use a text-mode WWW browser) and zlib support are all fully
optional in the mainstream ELinks and are not required for a normal operation.
Also ELinks attempts to stay usable even on small and rather old systems, which
somehow violates with this number of dependencies in Debian.
It would be ideal if there would be maybe several versions of the binary, ie.
the one which depends only on libc, then one which depends also on GPM and
zlib, then another one which depends also on GNUTLS and then another one which
depends also on Lua and X11. I'm not sure if the Debian packaging system can
handle binaries multiplexing based on presence of rec/sug dependencies.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 178038-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 00:38:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 17:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUZo4-0000wp-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 17:38:04 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUZhc-0002Wi-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 20:31:24 -0400
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#178038: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 20:31:24 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: elinks
Source-Version: 0.10.4-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elinks, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
elinks-lite_0.10.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks-lite_0.10.4-4_i386.deb
elinks_0.10.4-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-4.diff.gz
elinks_0.10.4-4.dsc
to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-4.dsc
elinks_0.10.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elinks package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:50:23 +0200
Source: elinks
Binary: elinks-lite elinks
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
elinks - advanced text-mode WWW browser
elinks-lite - advanced text-mode WWW browser (lite version)
Closes: 178038 218453
Changes:
elinks (0.10.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added elinks-lite: no extra dependencies (Closes: #178038, #218453)
Files:
126b9d03abff5cbc1f0d6bf6ee2cb0d3 886 web optional elinks_0.10.4-4.dsc
10e2d6bdef9c812b3272e2c601f29029 42440 web optional elinks_0.10.4-4.diff.gz
1c315e281483d542a7f60946e5db3504 1315042 web optional elinks_0.10.4-4_i386.deb
380f5b4d95a478ede200558c30316df7 711216 web optional
elinks-lite_0.10.4-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ask a key server
iD8DBQFCcSxDpxQ7cGWSgT0RAuXLAKCbbxSKHjpjo+f2EJJMIy8kJqxRQACeJfxS
JoqipNlie2vM8eDzd2DCC7M=
=S1N9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
