Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 00:45:27 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307943: libgtk2.0-dev: missing header file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 17:38:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 10:38:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 133.105.233.220.exetel.com.au (giskard.kumria.com)
[220.233.105.133]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DU6mC-0008Lr-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 10:38:13 -0700
Received: from eve.kumria.com ([203.7.227.183] ident=Debian-exim)
by giskard.kumria.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DU6lX-0003hN-Mi
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 May 2005 03:37:40 +1000
Received: from anand by eve.kumria.com with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DU6ky-0003qb-9Y
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 May 2005 03:36:56 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 03:36:56 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 203.7.227.183
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtk2.0-dev: missing header file
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on giskard.kumria.com)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libgtk2.0-dev
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: important
Hi,
While compiling some software, I received:
Continuing in src...
cc -c -I.. -I. -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0
-I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -DCURDIR=src -O2
-g -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 main.c
In file included from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkcolor.h:4,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdk.h:30,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:31,
from ui/gtk/gui.h:31,
from main.c:90:
/usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdktypes.h:51:23: gdkconfig.h: No such file or
directory
<gdk/gdktypes.h> (around line 50) has the following to say:
"/* The system specific file gdkconfig.h contains such configuration
* settings that are needed not only when compiling GDK (or GTK)
* itself, but also occasionally when compiling programs that use GDK
* (or GTK). One such setting is what windowing API backend is in use.
*/
#include <gdkconfig.h>
"
I've done some (very brief) checking and can't see anything related to
why this might have disapeared.
This missing include will cause a number of packages to
'Fail to Build From Source' (FTBFS).
Thanks,
Anand
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5-suspend
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libgtk2.0-dev depends on:
ii libatk1.0-dev 1.8.0-4 Development files for the ATK acce
ii libglib2.0-dev 2.6.4-1 Development files for the GLib lib
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-dev 1.8.1-1 Development files for the Pango
ii libx11-dev 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext-dev 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii pkg-config 0.17.2-1 manage compile and link flags for
ii xlibs-dev 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System client library dev
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307943-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 14:44:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 07:44:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baalzebub.progsoc.uts.edu.au [138.25.6.16] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVVyZ-0001SW-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 07:44:48 -0700
Received: from wildfire by baalzebub.progsoc.uts.edu.au with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1DVVzD-0002dv-8H; Wed, 11 May 2005 00:45:27 +1000
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 00:45:27 +1000
From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#307943: libgtk2.0-dev: missing header file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on baalzebub.progsoc.uts.edu.au); SAEximRunCond expanded
to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 14:30 +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> > > This looks like a system-local issue. Please check if a reinstall of
> > > libgtk2.0-dev fixes the problem.
> >
> > It isn't - yes I have the file.
> >
> > It should be in /usr/include/gdk/gdkconfig.h rather than the location it
> > currently is though.
>
> No, it should be in /usr/lib as it's an architecture-specific file.
Ahh, okay.
> $ pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
> -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
> -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
>
> Are you using pkg-config to get compile flags, or hard-coding them?
Yes gtk-gnutella uses pkg-config to get the compile flags.
However I have just done another re-install (after a full fsck) -- it
appears to have been a disk corruption issue locally.
Many thanks to everyone who looked at this report.
Regards,
Anand
--
`When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to
its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are
forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how
holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
