Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:30:52 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457554: manpages-dev: bind(2) references stdlio.h, which
doesn't exist in debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.39-1
Severity: normal
The example in bind(2) includes stdlio.h
stdlio.h is not provided by any debian package.
s/stdlio.h/stdio.h/ ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.utf8)
Versions of packages manpages-dev depends on:
ii manpages 2.39-1 Manual pages about using a GNU/Lin
manpages-dev recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.67-1
> On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 10:54 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:09:14PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
> > > Package: manpages-dev
> > > Version: 2.39-1
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > The example in bind(2) includes stdlio.h
> > >
> > > stdlio.h is not provided by any debian package.
> > >
> > > s/stdlio.h/stdio.h/ ?
> > Looks like this is something already fixed by 2.67-1 in unstable (or
> > earlier); can you confirm?
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 07:10:10PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote:
> It is indeed fixed in unstable. So I guess this bug should be labeled
> "etch". I don't think this bug alone wil rectify an update in stable.
For some time now [0], the BTS has done package version tracking, and
the "suite" tags are only used for tracking release updates. This bug
isn't anywhere near sufficiently significant to be included in such an
update, so I close it now (plus, it's trivial to include this arch:all
package with no dependencies on an otherwise stable system).
Thanks
Justin
References
[0] http://lists.debian.org./debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00010.html
IIRC there are also some later d-d-a messages regarding this
feature.
--- End Message ---
