Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:45:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458082: dictionaries-common: version in etch (0.70.10)
fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dictionaries-common
Version: 0.90.0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to a dependency issue or other problem, the package is not installable
by itself from the
etch repository (version 0.70.10). I encountered this when installing
iceweasel, and fixed it by
installing the package from testing (version 0.90.0). Here is the relevant
output when downgrading
the the stable version (since I now have 0.90.0 installed):
$ aptitude install dictionaries-common/stable
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
dictionaries-common
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/250kB of archives. After unpacking 53.2kB will be freed.
Writing extended state information... Done
Preconfiguring packages ...
dpkg - warning: downgrading dictionaries-common from 0.90.0 to 0.70.10.
(Reading database ... 48680 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace dictionaries-common 0.90.0 (using
.../dictionaries-common_0.70.10_all.deb) ...
No alternatives for ispell-dictionary.hash.
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/dictionaries-common_0.70.10_all.deb (--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/dictionaries-common_0.70.10_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
...(building dependency tree)...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (400, 'stable'), (300, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages dictionaries-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.17 Debian configuration management
sy
ii libtext-iconv-perl 1.4-3 converts between character sets
in
ii perl-base 5.8.8-7etch1 The Pathologically Eclectic
Rubbis
dictionaries-common recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
dictionaries-common/invalid_debconf_value:
dictionaries-common/selecting_ispell_wordlist_default:
dictionaries-common/default-ispell:
dictionaries-common/default-wordlist:
dictionaries-common/ispell-autobuildhash-message:
dictionaries-common/old_wordlist_link: true
dictionaries-common/move_old_usr_dict: true
dictionaries-common/remove_old_usr_dict_link: false
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 458082 0.81.1
thanks
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 06:12:27PM +0100, Karol Langner wrote:
>
> I guess you mean dpkg 1.14, makes no difference anyway.
>
Yes, thanks for the correction, this version mistake is an error in the
changelog.
> > Please check your dpkg version. If as seems is not the stable version, the
> > above stands.
> Yes, of course, I am using dpkg from etch. Sorry then for this noise, I
> didn't look into the problem too much.
No problem. Furthermore, mentioned bugs are archived, so they are not directly
shown when looking at the BTS.
> Sorry also for the version mistake, this was my first time sending a bug
> report.
Well, now we have a version mistake on each side ;-)
Thank for your feedback and your fast reply,
--
Agustin
--- End Message ---
