Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:00:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453078: closed by Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bug#453078: fixed in findutils 4.2.31-3)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: locate
Version: 4.2.31-2
Severity: normal
In an apt run, during which locate was being installed and findutils was
being upgraded from 4.2.31-1 to 4.2.31.2, and during which the new
findutils was unpacked *after* locate, I got the following error
message:
Unpacking locate (from .../locate_4.2.31-2_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/locate_4.2.31-2_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/locate/frcode', which is also in package
findutils
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Katkennut putki)
After the new findutils had been unpacked and configured, a new attempt
to install locate succeeded. It looks like you're missing some
dependency fields (remember that Depends is ignored at unpack time).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.8-ibid (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages locate depends on:
ii findutils 4.2.31-2 utilities for finding files--find,
ii libc6 2.7-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
locate recommends no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.2.31-3
On 2007-12-28 Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You wrote:
> > Do you think
> > this is worth the pain or may I simply say "That just happens when
> > switching from an old experimental version, 4.3.8-3 has been in
> > experimental for 6 weeks."?
> No, that fine. I hadnt even realized my original version was from
> experimental, or I wouldn't have reopened the bug at all.
Ok. closing again.
thanks, cu andreas
--- End Message ---
