Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 17:49:23 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308701: xpdf-i: Dummy package still needed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 23:21:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 16:21:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DW0WF-0006Xt-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:21:35 -0700
Received: (qmail 7619 invoked by uid 1013); 11 May 2005 23:21:34 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:21:34 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xpdf-i: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xpdf-i
Version: 1.0-1

The 'xpdf-i' package is present in sarge/sid and is also present (with the
exact same version) in woody. However, this is a dummy
transition-onlypackage (for potato?). Is there any reason this package
should still exist in the distribution? If not, please ask for removal of
the xpdf-i package.

Regards

Javier

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308701-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 07:50:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 00:50:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from risingsoftware01.propagation.net [66.221.33.65] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DW8T1-0000BD-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 00:50:47 -0700
Received: from c220-237-185-173.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au ([220.237.185.173] 
helo=noddy.cloud.net.au)
        by risingsoftware01.propagation.net with asmtp 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
        (Exim 4.34)
        id 1DW8Ss-0000ia-6k
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:50:46 -0500
Received: from hamish by noddy.cloud.net.au with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DW8Rf-00064S-RF
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 17:49:23 +1000
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:49:23 +1000
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308701: xpdf-i: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:21:34AM +0200, Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a wrote:
> Package: xpdf-i
> Version: 1.0-1
> 
> The 'xpdf-i' package is present in sarge/sid and is also present (with the
> exact same version) in woody. However, this is a dummy
> transition-onlypackage (for potato?). Is there any reason this package
> should still exist in the distribution? If not, please ask for removal of
> the xpdf-i package.

Removed as suggested (#308753 against ftp.debian.org). Thanks.

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to